|
1
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|
1.1
|
GENERAL INFORMATION
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1.1.1
|
Overview
|
This TrustIDâ
Certificate Policy contains the rules governing the
use of TrustID Certificates among those parties authorized
to participate in the Public Key Infrastructure described
by this Policy, namely: (i) PKI Service Providers, consisting
of (a) the Policy Management Authority; (b) Issuing
Certification Authorities; (c) Registration Authorities;
(d) Certificate Manufacturing Authorities, and (e) Repositories;
and (ii) End Entities, consisting of (a) Certificate
Holders and (b) Authorized Relying Parties. This
Policy describes the roles, responsibilities, and relationships
of the PKI Service Providers and End Entities (collectively
"Participants"), and the rules and requirements
for the issuance, acquisition, management, and use of
TrustID Certificates to verify Digital Signatures and
to encrypt and authenticate electronic communications.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.1.2
|
General Definitions
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1.1.2.1
|
Terms
|
Capitalized terms used in this Policy
have the following meanings:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Accept or Acceptance
|
An End Entity’s act that triggers the
End Entity’s rights and obligations with respect to
its TrustID Certificate under the applicable Certificate
Agreement or Authorized Relying Party Agreement. Indications
of Acceptance may include without limitation: (i) using
the TrustID Certificate (after issuance); (ii) failing
to notify the Issuing CA of any problems with the TrustID
Certificate within a reasonable time after receiving
it, or (iii) other manifestations of assent.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Activation Data
|
Private data used or required to access
or activate Cryptomodules (e.g., a personal identification
number (PIN), pass phrase, or a manually-held key share
used to unlock a Private Key prior to creating a Digital
Signature).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Affiliated Individual
|
An Individual having an affiliation with
an Organization who has been authorized by the Organization
to obtain a TrustID Certificate that identifies the
Organization and the fact of the Individual’s affiliation
with the Organization. See "Sponsoring Organization."
|
| |
|
|
| |
Applicant
|
An Individual or Organization that submits
application information to an RA or an Issuing CA for
the purpose of obtaining or renewing a TrustID Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Authority Revocation List (ARL)
|
A list of revoked CA Certificates. An
ARL is a CRL for CA Certificates.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Authorized Relying Party
|
An Individual or Organization that has
entered into an Authorized Relying Party Agreement.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Authorized Relying Party Agreement
|
A contract between an Individual or an
Organization and an Issuing CA allowing the party to
rely on TrustID Certificates in accordance with this
Policy.
|
| |
|
|
| |
CA Certificate
|
A Certificate at the beginning of a certification
chain within the TrustID PKI hierarchy. A CA Certificate
is established as part of the set-up and activation
of the Issuing CA. The CA Certificate contains the Public
Key that corresponds to the CA Private Signing Key used
either to create or manage TrustID Certificates. CA
Certificates and their corresponding Public Keys may
be embedded in software or obtained or downloaded by
the affirmative act of an Authorized Relying Party in
order to establish a certification chain.
|
| |
|
|
| |
CA Private Signing Key
|
The Private Key that corresponds to the
Issuing CA's Public Key listed in its CA Certificate
and used to sign TrustID Certificates.
|
| |
|
|
| |
CA Private Root Key
|
The Private Key used to sign CA Certificates.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certificate
|
A computer-based record or electronic
message that: (i) identifies the Certification Authority
issuing it; (ii) names or identifies a Certificate Holder
or Authorized Relying Party; (iii) contains the Public
Key of the Certificate Holder or Authorized Relying
Party; (iv) identifies the Certificate's Validity Period;
(v) is digitally signed by a Certification Authority;
and (vi) has the meaning ascribed to it in accordance
with applicable standards. A Certificate includes not
only its actual content but also all documents expressly
referenced or incorporated in it.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certificate Agreement
|
The contract between a Certificate Holder
and the CA and/or RA that details the procedures, rights
and obligations of each party with respect to a TrustID
Certificate issued to the Certificate Holder.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certificate Holder
|
An Individual or Organization that: (i)
is named or identified in a TrustID Certificate, or
is responsible for the Electronic Device named, as the
subject of the TrustID Certificate; and (ii) holds a
Private Key that corresponds to the Public Key listed
in that TrustID Certificate; however, for purposes of
interpreting this Policy, persons holding Certificates
for administrative purposes (e.g., the subject of an
Authorized Relying Party certificate used to access
a Repository to verify Certificate status) will not
be considered "Certificate Holders" with respect
to Certificates issued under this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certificate Policy (CP)
|
A named set of rules that indicates the
applicability of Certificates to particular communities
and classes of applications and specifies the Identification
and Authentication processes performed prior to Certificate
issuance, the Certificate Profile and other allowed
uses of Certificates.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certificate Manufacturing Authority (CMA)
|
An Organization that manufactures or creates
TrustID Certificates for a particular Issuing CA.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certificate Profile
|
The protocol used in Section 7 of this
Policy to establish the allowed format and contents
of data fields within TrustID Certificates, which identify
the Issuing CA, the End Entity, the Certificate’s Validity
Period, and other information that identifies the End
Entity.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certificate Revoc-ation List (CRL)
|
A database or other list of Certificates
that have been revoked prior to the expiration of their
Validity Period.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certification Authority (CA)
|
An entity that creates, issues, manages
and revokes Certificates. See also Issuing
CA.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Certification Practice Statement (CPS)
|
A statement of the practices that a CA
employs in creating, issuing, managing and revoking
Certificates.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Cross-Certificate
|
A Certificate used to establish a trust
relationship between two Certification Authorities.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Cryptomodule
|
Secure software, device or utility that:
(i) generates Key Pairs, (ii) stores cryptographic information,
and/or (iii) performs cryptographic functions.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Digital Signature/ Digitally Sign
|
The transformation of an electronic record
by one person using a Private Key and Public Key Cryptography
so that another person having the transformed record
and the corresponding Public Key can accurately determine:
(i) whether the transformation was created using the
Private Key that corresponds to the Public Key; and
(ii) whether the record has been altered since the transformation
was made.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Distinguished Name (DN)
|
The unique identifier for a Certificate
Holder so that he, she or it can be located in a directory
(e.g., the DN for a Certificate Holder might contain
the following attributes: common name (cn), e-mail address
(mail), Organization name (o), Organizational unit (ou),
locality (l), state (st) and country (c)).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Electronic Device
|
Computer software, hardware or other electronic
or automated means configured and enabled by a person
to act as its agent and to initiate or respond to electronic
records or performances, in whole or in part, without
review or intervention by such person.
|
| |
|
|
| |
End Entity(ies)
|
Certificate Holders and Authorized Relying
Parties.
|
| |
|
|
| |
High-Security Zone
|
An area to which access is controlled
through an entry point and limited to authorized, appropriately
screened personnel and properly escorted visitors, accessible
only from Security Zones, separated from Security Zones
and Operations Zones by a perimeter. High-Security Zones
are monitored 24 hours a day and 7 days a week by security
staff, other personnel and electronic means.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Identification and Authentication (I&A)
|
To ascertain and confirm through appropriate
inquiry and investigation the identity of an End Entity
or Sponsoring Organization.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Individual
|
A natural person and not a juridical person
or legal entity.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Issue Certificates/ Issuance
|
The act performed by a CA in creating
a Certificate, listing itself as "Issuer,"
and notifying the Applicant of its contents and that
the Certificate is ready and available for Acceptance.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Issuing Certification Authority
(Issuing CA)
|
An entity authorized by the PMA to issue
and sign Certificates in accordance with this Policy
and licensed by DST to brand such Certificates with
the TrustID mark.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Key
|
A general term used throughout this Policy
to encompass any one of the defined keys mentioned in
this General Definitions section.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Key Generation
|
The process of creating a Key Pair.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Key Pair
|
Two mathematically related Keys (a Private
Key and its corresponding Public Key), having the properties
that: (i) one Key can be used to encrypt a communication
that can only be decrypted using the other Key; and
(ii) even knowing one Key it is computationally infeasible
to discover the other Key.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
(LDAP)
|
A client-server protocol used for accessing
an X.500 directory service over the Internet.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Object Identifier (OID)
|
The unique alphanumeric/numeric identifier
registered under the ISO registration standard to reference
a specific object or object class. In the PKI established
by this Policy, they are used to uniquely identify Certificates
issued under this Policy and the cryptographic algorithms
supported.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Online Status Check
|
An online, real-time status check of the
validity of a TrustID Certificate. An Online Status
Check involving a CRL consists of checking the most
recently issued CRL (e.g., not involving a cached CRL).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Operational Period
|
A Certificate’s actual term of validity,
beginning with the start of the Validity Period and
ending on the earlier of (i) the end of the Validity
Period disclosed in the Certificate, or (ii) the revocation
of the Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Operations Zone
|
An area where access is limited to personnel
who work there and to properly escorted visitors. Operations
Zones should be monitored at least periodically and
should preferably be accessible only from a Reception
Zone.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Organization
|
An entity that is legally recognized in
its jurisdiction of origin (e.g., a corporation, partnership,
sole proprietorship, government department, non-government
organization, university, trust, special interest group
or non-profit corporation).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Participants
|
All PKI Service Providers and End Entities
authorized to participate in the PKI defined by this
Policy.
|
| |
|
|
| |
PKI Service Providers
|
The PMA, Issuing CAs, RAs, CMAs, and Repositories
participating in the PKI defined by this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
| |
PMA Charter
|
The document adopted by the PMA that identifies
the policies and procedures for administering this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Policy
|
This TrustID Certificate Policy.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Policy Management Authority (PMA)
|
The Organization responsible for setting,
implementing and administering policy decisions regarding
this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Private Key
|
The Key of a Key Pair kept secret by its
holder, used to create Digital Signatures and to decrypt
messages or files that were encrypted with the corresponding
Public Key.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Public Key
|
The Key of a Key Pair publicly disclosed
by the holder of the corresponding Private Key and used
by the recipient to validate Digital Signatures created
with the corresponding Private Key and to encrypt messages
or files to be decrypted with the corresponding Private
Key.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Public Key Cryptography
|
A type of cryptography also known as asymmetric
cryptography that uses a Key Pair to securely encrypt
and decrypt messages.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)
|
The architecture, organization, techniques,
practices, and procedures that collectively support
the implementation and operation of a Certificate-based
Public Key Cryptography system.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reasonable Reliance
|
For purposes of this Policy, an Authorized
Relying Party's decision to rely on a TrustID Certificate
will be considered Reasonable Reliance if he, she or
it:
-
Has entered into an Authorized Relying
Party Agreement and agreed to be bound by the terms
and conditions of this Policy;
-
Verified that the Digital Signature
in question (if any) was created by the Private
Key corresponding to the Public Key in the TrustID
Certificate during the time that the TrustID Certificate
was valid, and that the communication signed with
the Digital Signature had not been altered;
-
Verified that the TrustID Certificate
in question was valid at the time of the Authorized
Relying Party’s reliance, by conducting a status
check of the Certificate's then-current validity
as required by the Issuing CA; and
-
Used the TrustID Certificate for purposes
appropriate under this Policy and under circumstances
where reliance would be reasonable and in good faith
in light of all the circumstances that were known
or should have been known to the Authorized Relying
Party prior to reliance. (An Authorized Relying
Party bears all risk of relying on a TrustID Certificate
while knowing or having reason to know of any facts
that would cause a person of ordinary business prudence
to refrain from relying on the Certificate).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reception Zone
|
The entry to a facility where the initial
contact between the public and the Issuing CA or RA
occurs, where services are provided, information is
exchanged and access to Restricted Zones is controlled.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Registration Authority (RA)
|
An entity contractually delegated by an
Issuing CA to accept and process Certificate applications,
and to verify the identity of potential End Entities
and authenticate information contained in Certificate
applications, in conformity with the provisions of this
Policy and related agreements.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Registration Authority Agreement
|
An agreement entered into between an entity
and a CA authorizing the entity to act as an RA, and
detailing the specific duties and obligations of the
RA, including but not limited to, the procedures for
conducting appropriate I&A on potential End Entities.
|
| |
|
|
| |
RA Security and Operations Manual
|
A manual, handbook or other publications
in either hard-copy or electronic form that outlines
the security and general operations standards and rules
for a particular PKI.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Repository
|
An online system maintained by an Issuing
CA for storing and retrieving Certificates and other
information relevant to Certificates, including information
relating to Certificate validity or revocation.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Restricted Zones
|
Any one of : (i) an Operations Zone; (ii)
a Security Zone; and (iii) a High Security Zone.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Revocation
|
The act of making a Certificate permanently
ineffective from a specified time forward. Revocation
is effected by notation or inclusion in a set of revoked
Certificates or other directory or database of revoked
Certificates (e.g., inclusion in a CRL).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Security Zone
|
An area to which access is limited to
authorized personnel and to authorized and properly
escorted visitors. Security Zones should preferably
be accessible from an Operations Zone, and through a
specific entry point. A Security Zone need not be separated
from an Operations Zone by a secure perimeter. A Security
Zone should be monitored 24 hours a day and 7 days a
week by security staff, other personnel or electronic
means.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared Secret
|
Activation Data used to assist parties
in authenticating identity and establishing a reliable
channel of communication. For purposes of establishing
identity between an RA and a Certificate Holder, a Shared
Secret may consist of an account PIN or online banking
password shared solely between the RA and the Certificate
Holder, but not the Issuing CA. For purposes of establishing
identity between the Certificate Holder and the Issuing
CA necessary for Certificate issuance, a Shared Secret
consists of different Activation Data, which is shared
among the RA, Certificate Holder and Issuing CA.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Split-Knowledge Technique
|
A security procedure where no single individual
possesses the equipment, knowledge or expertise to view,
alter or otherwise have access to sensitive or confidential
information in a particular PKI.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Sponsoring Organization
|
An Organization that has an affiliation
with an Individual and has authorized the Individual
to hold a TrustID Certificate that identifies the Organization
and the fact of the Individual’s affiliation with the
Organization. See "Affiliated Individual."
|
| |
|
|
| |
Subject Name
|
The specific field in a Certificate containing
the unique name-identifier for the Certificate Holder.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Token
|
A Cryptomodule consisting of a hardware
object (e.g., a "smart card"), often with
memory and a microchip.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Trusted Role
|
A role involving functions that may introduce
security problems if not carried out properly, whether
accidentally or maliciously. The functions of Trusted
Roles form the basis of trust for the entire PKI.
|
| |
|
|
| |
TrustID Certificate
|
A Certificate issued pursuant to this
Policy by an Issuing CA authorized to do so by the PMA
and DST.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Trustworthy System
|
Computer hardware and software that: (i)
are reasonably secure from intrusion and misuse; (ii)
provide a reasonable level of availability; and (iii)
are reasonably suited to perform their intended functions.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Validity Period
|
The intended term of validity of a Certificate,
beginning with the date of Issuance ("Valid From"
or "Activation" date), and ending on the expiration
date indicated in the Certificate ("Valid To"
or "Expiry" date).
|
| |
|
|
|
1.1.2.2
|
Acronyms
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
ABA
|
American Bankers Association
|
| |
|
|
| |
ARL
|
Authority Revocation List
|
| |
|
|
| |
CA
|
Certification Authority
|
| |
|
|
| |
CMA
|
Certificate Manufacturing Authority
|
| |
|
|
| |
CPS
|
Certification Practice Statement
|
| |
|
|
| |
CRL
|
Certificate Revocation List
|
| |
|
|
| |
DN
|
Distinguished Name
|
| |
|
|
| |
DSA
|
Digital signature algorithm
|
| |
|
|
| |
DST
|
Digital Signature Trust Co.
|
| |
|
|
| |
I&A
|
Identification and Authentication
|
| |
|
|
| |
LDAP
|
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
|
| |
|
|
| |
ISO
|
International Standards Organization
|
| |
|
|
| |
OID
|
Object Identifier
|
| |
|
|
| |
PKI
|
Public Key Infrastructure
|
| |
|
|
| |
PMA
|
Policy Management Authority
|
| |
|
|
| |
RA
|
Registration Authority
|
| |
|
|
| |
X.500
|
The ITU-T (International Telecommunication
Union-T) standard that establishes a distributed, hierarchical
directory protocol organized by country, region,
Organization, etc.
|
| |
|
|
| |
X.501
|
The ITU-T (International Telecommunication
Union-T) standard for use of Distinguished Names in
an X.500 directory.
|
| |
|
|
| |
X.509
|
The ITU-T (International Telecommunication
Union-T) standard for Certificates. X.509, version 3,
refers to Certificates containing or capable of containing
extensions.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.1.3
|
Monetary Amounts
|
All monetary values used in this Policy
are in United States Dollars.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.2
|
IDENTIFICATION
|
The American National Standards Institute
("ANSI") has assigned DST a unique numeric
Object Identifier ("OID") of 2.16.840.1.113839.
DST has registered an OID for this Policy, which may
not be used except as specifically authorized by this
Policy. The Policy OID to be asserted in TrustID Certificates
issued in accordance with this Policy will have a base
arc of: {joint-iso-ccitt (2) country (16) USA (840)
US-company (1) DST (113839) CP (0) TrustID-v2 (6)}.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.2.1
|
Certificate Types
|
The following certificate types and OIDs
will be recognized for use within the PKI established
by this Policy. All TrustID Certificates issued under
this Policy will contain the OID listed below in the
CertificatePolicies field of the Certificate:
TrustID Personal Certificates (2.16.840.1.113839.0.6.1)
– issued to Individuals in accordance with Section 3.1;
TrustID Business Certificates (2.16.840.1.113839.0.6.2)
– issued to Affiliated Individuals in accordance with
Section 3.1
TrustID Server Certificate (2.16.840.1.113839.0.6.3)
– issued to SSL-enabled Electronic Devices in accordance
with Section 3.1.10.
TrustID Demo Certificate (2.16.840.1.113839.0.6.4)
– issued solely for testing and demonstration purposes.
Administrative CA Certificates – (arc
of 2.16.840.1.113839.0.7)
used solely for the management and operation
of the PKI, including:
Administrators (2.16.840.1.113839.0.7.1)
Registration Authorities (2.16.840.1.113839.0.7.2)
Authorized Relying Parties (2.16.840.1.113839.0.7.3)
Others as needed
Other Types – as allowed by this Policy
and upon approval of the PMA.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3
|
COMMUNITY AND APPLICABILITY
|
This Policy describes an open-but-bounded
Public Key Infrastructure. It describes the rights and
obligations of all Participants – i.e., all persons
and entities authorized under this Policy to fulfill
any of the following roles: Policy Management Authority,
Certification Authority, Registration Authority, Certificate
Manufacturing Authority, Repository, Certificate Holder
and Authorized Relying Party.
|
|
1.3.1
|
PKI Service Providers
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.1.1
|
The PMA
|
The PMA for this Policy is the ABA, which
will administer the policy decisions regarding this
Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.1.2
|
Issuing CAs
|
Issuing CAs are Organizations authorized
by the PMA to create, sign, issue, and manage Certificates.
An Issuing CA may issue TrustID Certificates only if
it is licensed by DST to use the TrustID mark and approved
by the PMA, following satisfaction of the requirements
established under the PMA Charter and satisfaction of
the requirements for Certificate interoperability specified
by the PMA.
Each Issuing CA is bound to act according
to the terms of this Policy. An Issuing CA's specific
practices, in addition to the more general requirements
set out in this Policy, must be set out in a Certification
Practice Statement adopted by the Issuing CA and approved
by the PMA. The Issuing CA’s CPS will set forth, among
other things, the types of TrustID Certificates to be
issued by the Issuing CA (e.g., personal Certificates,
business Certificates, server Certificates). An Issuing
CA must enter into an agreement with the PMA, for the
benefit of all End Entities, to be bound by and comply
with the undertakings and representations of this Policy,
with respect to all TrustID Certificates it issues.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.1.3
|
Registration Authorities (RAs)
|
Each Issuing CA will remain ultimately
responsible for all TrustID Certificates it issues.
However, under this Policy, the Issuing CA may subcontract
registration and I&A functions to an Organization
that agrees to fulfill the functions of an RA in accordance
with the terms of this Policy, and who will accept TrustID
Certificate applications and locally collect and verify
Applicant identity information to be entered into a
TrustID Certificate. An RA operating under this Policy
is only responsible for those duties assigned to it
by the Issuing CA pursuant to an agreement with the
Issuing CA or as specified in this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.1.4
|
Certificate Manufacturing Authorities
(CMAs)
|
The Issuing CA will remain ultimately
responsible for the manufacture of TrustID Certificates.
However, the Issuing CA may subcontract manufacturing
functions to third party CMAs who agree to be bound
by this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.1.5
|
Repositories
|
The Issuing CA will perform the role and
functions of the Repository. The Issuing CA may subcontract
performance of the Repository functions to a third party
Organization that agrees to fulfill the functions of
a Repository, and who agrees to be bound by this Policy,
but the Issuing CA remains responsible for the performance
of those services in accordance with this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.2
|
End Entities
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.2.1
|
Certificate Holders
|
The Issuing CA may issue TrustID Certificates
to the following classes of Certificate Holders: Individuals
and Organizations.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.2.2
|
Authorized Relying Parties
|
This Policy is intended for the benefit
of Individuals and Organizations who have entered into
an Authorized Relying Party Agreement to be bound by
this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.3
|
PKI Applicability and Applications
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.3.1
|
Purpose
|
TrustID Certificates are intended to support
verification of Digital Signatures in applications where:
(i) the identity of communicating parties needs to be
authenticated; (ii) a message or file needs to be bound
to the identity of its originator by a signature; and/or
(iii) the integrity of the file or message has to be
assured.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.3.2
|
Approved Applications
|
Applications for which TrustID Certificates
are suitable include, but are not limited to, applications
that:
-
provide authentication-based access
and secure communication with online sources of
information, including those that distribute information
based on a fee or subscription and those which handle
the Certificate Holder’s personal or restricted
information, such as financial institutions, governmental
agencies, health/medical and insurance providers
and others;
-
provide support for form signing and
other application processes and filings with governmental
and non-governmental Organizations; and
-
sign, encrypt, decrypt and/or verify
electronic messages and Digital Signatures on contracts,
letters of credit, wire transfers, foreign exchange
transactions, stock transactions, cash management
transactions, security interests, bank statements
and other electronic documentation.
|
| |
|
|
|
i
|
Prohibited Applications
|
TrustID Certificates may not be used for:
(i) any application requiring fail-safe performance
such as: (a) the operation of nuclear power facilities,
(b) air traffic control systems, (c) aircraft navigation
systems, (d) weapons control systems, or (e) any
other system whose failure could lead to injury, death
or environmental damage; or (ii) transactions where
applicable law prohibits the use of Digital Signatures
for such transactions.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.3.4
|
Cross-Certification
|
The PMA may approve cross-certification
between an Issuing CA and other Certification Authorities,
and Issuing CAs must inform End Entities of the uses
allowed within the cross-certified PKI. Any cross-certification
to external organizations will only be done after approval
by the PMA or its designee.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.4
|
CONTACT DETAILS
|
This Policy is owned and administered
by DST under agreements with the ABA.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.4.1
|
Specification / Policy Administration
Organization
|
The ABA is the PMA for this Policy. The
PMA can be reached at: ABA Policy Management Authority,
7th Floor, 1120 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington
DC 20036.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.4.2
|
Contact Person
|
Questions regarding the implementation
and administration of this Policy should be directed
to: (i) Digital Signature Trust Co., 255 North Admiral Byrd Rd. Salt Lake City, Ut 84116-3703 Attention:
Legal Department; or (ii) legal@trustdst.com.
|
| |
|
|
|
1.4.3
|
Person Determining CPS Suitability
|
The PMA will determine the suitability
of any CPS to this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2
|
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1
|
APPORTIONING LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES AMONG
PARTIES
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.1
|
PKI Service Provider Obligations, Representations
And Liability
|
No joint venture, partnership, trust,
agency or fiduciary relationship is established or deemed
to be established among any of the parties using this
Policy or the PKI established pursuant hereto. Issuance
of TrustID Certificates in accordance with this Policy
does not make the Issuing CA, or any RA, an agent, fiduciary,
trustee, or other representative of Certificate Holders
or Authorized Relying Parties.
PKI Service Providers assume no liability
whatsoever in relation to the use of TrustID Certificates
or associated Key Pairs for any use other than in accordance
with this Policy or related agreements. Each End Entity
will indemnify and hold the PKI Service Providers and
their respective directors, officers, employees, agents
and affiliates harmless from any and all liability arising
out of the End Entity’s use of a TrustID Certificate
for other than its intended use.
The PKI Service Providers, and their employees,
servants or agents, make no representations or warranties,
express or implied, other than as expressly stated in
this Policy or in an agreement between the PKI Service
Provider and an End Entity. Except as expressly prohibited
in this Policy, PKI Service Providers may disclaim all
warranties and obligations of any type, including without
limitation: (i) any warranty of merchantability; (ii)
any warranty of fitness for a particular purpose; (iii)
any warranty of accuracy of information provided; and
(iv) any warranty of non-infringement.
The PMA, Issuing CAs, and RAs are neither
intermediaries nor guarantors of the underlying transactions
between End Entities. Recourse, liability and dispute
resolution for claims solely between End Entities (e.g.,
claims of non-performance not related to Certificate
Holder identity) shall be under applicable law. Claims
against PKI Service Providers are limited to showing
that the PKI Service Providers operated in a manner
inconsistent with this Policy, the applicable CPS or
a related agreement or warranty. PKI Service Providers
are responsible to an Authorized Relying Party only
if the Authorized Relying Party has complied with all
obligations, terms and conditions of this Policy and
of the applicable Authorized Relying Party Agreement,
and only to the extent otherwise allowed by this Policy.
In addition, PKI Service Providers are responsible to
an Authorized Relying Party only for direct damages
suffered by such Authorized Relying Party that are (i)
caused by the failure of the PKI Service Provider to
comply with the terms of this Policy, the CPS or a related
agreement or warranty, and (ii) sustained by such
Authorized Relying Party as a result of Reasonable Reliance
on a TrustID Certificate in accordance with this Policy.
PKI Service Providers may enter into indemnification
agreements with other PKI Service Providers to appropriately
allocate the risk and financial responsibility arising
from the parties’ respective duties and obligations.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2
|
Issuing CA Obligations, Representations
and Liability
|
The Issuing CA is responsible for all
aspects of the issuance and management of a TrustID
Certificate including: (i) the application and enrollment
process; (ii) the Identification and Authentication
process; (iii) the actual Certificate manufacturing
process; (iv) publication of the Certificate; (v) revocation
of the Certificate; (vi) renewal of the Certificate;
and (vii) ensuring that all aspects of the Issuing CA
services and CA operations and infrastructure related
to Certificates issued under this Policy are performed
in accordance with the requirements, representations,
and warranties of this Policy, including the following:
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.1
|
Notification of Certificate Issuance and
Revocation
|
The Issuing CA must make an online Certificate
status database or Certificate Revocation Lists available
to End Entities in accordance with Section 4.10. The
Issuing CA must notify an End Entity when a TrustID
Certificate bearing the End Entity’s DN is issued or
revoked.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.2
|
Certificate Holder Warranties
|
Issuing CAs must provide the following
warranties, in separate writing or in contract, to all
Certificate Holders of TrustID Certificates they issue:
-
The Issuing CA has issued and managed
the TrustID Certificate in accordance with the applicable
Certificate Agreement (and in accordance with this
Policy and any applicable CPS, if this Policy has
been incorporated by reference in the Certificate
Agreement (see Section 2.1.2.7)) ; and
-
The TrustID Certificate meets all
requirements of the applicable Certificate Agreement
(and this Policy and any applicable CPS, if this
Policy has been incorporated by reference in the
Certificate Agreement (see Section 2.1.2.7)).
Such warranties shall be made as of: (i)
the time of the Certificate Holder’s Acceptance of the
TrustID Certificate; and (ii) the time that the Certificate
Holder’s TrustID Certificate is used during its Operational
Period.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.3
|
Authorized Relying Party Warranties
|
Issuing CAs must provide the following
warranties, in separate writing or in contract, to all
Authorized Relying Parties:
-
The Issuing CA has issued and managed
the TrustID Certificate in accordance with this
Policy;
-
The Issuing CA complied with the requirements
of this Policy and any applicable CPS when verifying
identity of the Certificate Holder;
-
There are no material misrepresentations
of fact in the TrustID Certificate known to the
Issuing CA, and the Issuing CA has taken steps as
required under this Policy to verify the information
contained in the TrustID Certificate;
-
The Issuing CA has taken all steps
required by this Policy to ensure that the Certificate
Holder's submitted information has been accurately
transcribed to the TrustID Certificate; and
-
The TrustID Certificate meets all
material requirements of this Policy and any applicable
CPS.
These warranties must be offered to any
Authorized Relying Party who: (i) relies on a TrustID
Certificate in an electronic transaction in which the
TrustID Certificate played a material role in verifying
the identity of one or more persons or devices; (ii) exercises
Reasonable Reliance on that TrustID Certificate; and
(ii) follows all procedures required by this Policy
and by the applicable Authorized Relying Party Agreement
for verifying the status of the TrustID Certificate.
These warranties must be made to the Authorized Relying
Party as of the time the Repository is referenced to
determine TrustID Certificate validity, and only if
the TrustID Certificate is valid and not revoked at
that time.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.4
|
Warranty Limitations
|
The warranties offered to both Certificate
Holders and Authorized Relying Parties will be subject
to the limitations set forth elsewhere in this Policy.
Issuing CAs may provide further limitations and exclusions
on these warranties as the Issuing CA deems appropriate,
relating to: (i) the End Entity’s (a) improper use of
Certificates or Key Pairs, (b) failure to safeguard
Private Keys, (c) failure to comply with the provisions
of this Policy or of any agreement with the Issuing
CA or RA, and/or (d) other actions giving rise to any
loss; (ii) events beyond the reasonable control of the
Issuing CA and the RAs; and (iii) time limitations for
the filing of claims.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.5
|
Time Between Certificate Request and Issuance
|
There is no stipulation for the period
between the receipt of an application for a TrustID
Certificate and the issuance of a TrustID Certificate,
but the Issuing CA will make reasonable efforts to ensure
prompt issuance.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.6
|
Certificate Revocation and Renewal
|
The Issuing CA must ensure that any procedures
for the expiration, revocation and renewal of a TrustID
Certificate will conform to the relevant provisions
of this Policy and will be expressly stated in a Certificate
Agreement and any other applicable document outlining
the terms and conditions of Certificate use, including
ensuring that: (i) Key Changeover Procedures are in
accordance with Section 5.6; (ii) notice of revocation
of a Certificate will be posted to an online Certificate
status database and/or a CRL, as applicable, within
the time limits stated in Section 4.9; and (iii) the
address of the online Certificate status database and/or
CRL is defined in the TrustID Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.7
|
End Entity Agreements
|
The Issuing CA will enter into agreements
with End Entities governing the provision of Certificate
and Repository services and delineating the parties’
respective rights and obligations.
The Issuing CA will ensure that all Certificate
Agreements incorporate by reference the provisions of
this Policy regarding the Issuing CA’s and the Certificate
Holder’s rights and obligations. In the alternative,
the Issuing CA may ensure that its Certificate Agreements,
by their terms, provide the respective rights and obligations
of the Issuing CA and the Certificate Holders as set
forth in this Policy, including without limitation the
parties’ rights and responsibilities concerning the
following:
-
Procedures, rights and responsibilities
governing (i) application for a TrustID Certificate,
(ii) the enrollment process, (iii) Certificate issuance,
and (iv) Certificate Acceptance;
-
The Certificate Holder’s duties to
provide accurate information during the application
process;
-
The Certificate Holder’s duties with
respect to generating and protecting its Keys;
-
Procedures, rights and responsibilities
with respect to I&A;
-
Any restrictions on the use of TrustID
Certificates and the corresponding Keys;
-
Procedures, rights and responsibilities
governing (a) notification of changes in Certificate
information, and (b) revocation of TrustID Certificates;
-
Procedures, rights and responsibilities
governing renewal of TrustID Certificates;
-
Any obligation of the Certificate
Holder to indemnify any other Participant;
-
Provisions regarding fees;
-
The rights and responsibilities of
any RA that is party to the agreement;
-
Any warranties made by the Issuing
CA and any limitations on warranties or liability
of the Issuing CA and/or an RA;
-
Provisions regarding the protection
of privacy and confidential information; and
-
Provisions regarding Alternative Dispute
Resolution.
Nothing in the Certificate Agreements
may waive or otherwise lessen the obligations of the
Certificate Holder as provided in Section 2.1.4 of this
Policy.
The Issuing CA will ensure that all Authorized
Relying Party Agreements incorporate by reference the
provisions of this Policy regarding the Issuing CA’s
and the Authorized Relying Party’s rights and obligations.
Nothing in the Authorized Relying Party Agreements may
waive or otherwise lessen the obligations of the Authorized
Relying Party as provided in Section 2.1.5 of this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.8
|
Protection of Private Keys
|
The Issuing CA must ensure that its Private
Keys and Activation Data are protected in accordance
with Parts 4 and 6 of this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.9
|
Restrictions On Issuing CA's Private Key
Use
|
The Issuing CA must ensure that its CA
Private Signing Key is used only to sign Certificates
and CRLs. The Issuing CA must ensure that Private Keys
issued to its personnel to access and operate CA applications
are used only for such purposes. To the extent CA personnel
require or wish to use Certificates for non-CA purposes,
they should be issued separate Certificates appropriate
for such use.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.10
|
Ensuring Compliance
|
The Issuing CA must ensure that: (i) it
only accepts information from RAs that understand and
are obligated to comply with this Policy; (ii) it complies
with the provisions of this Policy in its certification
and Repository services, issuance and revocation of
TrustID Certificates and issuance of CRLs; (iii) it
makes reasonable efforts to ensure RA and End Entity
adherence to this Policy with regard to any TrustID
Certificates issued under it; and (iv) its or any RAs'
authentication and validation procedures are implemented
as set forth in Part 3.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2.11
|
Consequences of Breach
|
An Issuing CA’s liability to an End Entity
will be determined in accordance with any agreement
between the Issuing CA and the End Entity, as such liability
may be limited by Section 2.1.1 and other provisions
of this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.3
|
RA Obligations and Liability
|
The Issuing CA must ensure that all its
RAs comply with all the relevant provisions of this
Policy and the Issuing CA's CPS. The Issuing CA shall
continue to be responsible for any matters delegated
to an RA, although an Issuing CA and an RA may enter
into an indemnification agreement in accordance with
Sections 2.1.1.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.3.1
|
Notification of Certificate Issuance and
Revocation
|
Unless otherwise provided by contract,
there are no requirements that an RA notify a Certificate
Holder or Authorized Relying Party of the issuance or
revocation of a TrustID Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.3.2
|
Accuracy of RA Representations
|
When an RA submits End Entity or Sponsoring
Organization information to an Issuing CA, it certifies
to the Issuing CA that it has authenticated the identity
of that End Entity or Sponsoring Organization in accordance
with Parts 3 and 4 of this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.3.3
|
Protection of RA Private Keys
|
Each person performing RA duties online
through a remote administration application with the
Issuing CA must ensure that his or her Private Keys
are protected in accordance with Parts 5 and 6 of this
Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.3.4
|
Restrictions On RA Private Key Use
|
Private Keys used by RA personnel to access
and operate RA Applications online with the Issuing
CA must not be used for any other purpose.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.3.5
|
RA Security and Operations Manual
|
Each RA will comply with the provisions
of an RA Security and Operations Manual provided by
the Issuing CA to its RAs.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.3.6
|
Consequences of Breach
|
An RA’s liability to an End Entity will
be determined in accordance with any agreement between
the RA and the End Entity, as such liability may be
limited by Section 2.1.1 and other provisions of this
Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.4
|
Applicant/Certificate Holder Obligations,
Representations and Liability
|
The responsibilities of each Applicant/Certificate
Holder are to:
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.4.1
|
Representations
|
Provide complete and accurate responses
to all requests for information made by the Issuing
CA (or an RA) during Applicant registration, Certificate
application, and I&A processes; and upon issuance
of a TrustID Certificate naming the Applicant as the
Certificate Holder, review the Certificate to ensure
that all Certificate Holder information included in
it is accurate, and to Accept or reject the Certificate
in accordance with Section 4.4;
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.4.2
|
Protection of Certificate Holder's Private
Key
|
Generate a Key Pair using a Trustworthy
System, and take reasonable precautions to prevent any
compromise, modification, loss, disclosure, or unauthorized
use of the Private Key;
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.4.3
|
Restrictions on Certificate Holder's Private
Key Use
|
Use the TrustID Certificate and the corresponding
Private Key exclusively for purposes authorized by this
Policy and only in a manner consistent with this Policy;
and
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.4.4
|
Notification Upon Private Key Compromise
|
Instruct the Issuing CA (or an RA) to
revoke the TrustID Certificate promptly upon any actual
or suspected loss, disclosure, or other compromise of
the Private Key, or, in the case of a TrustID Certificate
issued to an Affiliated Individual under Section 3.1.10,
whenever the Affiliated Individual is no longer affiliated
with the Sponsoring Organization.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.4.5
|
Consequences of Breach
|
A Certificate Holder who is found to have
acted in a manner counter to these obligations will
have his, her or its TrustID Certificate revoked, and
will forfeit all claims he, she or it may have against
PKI Service Providers.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.4.6
|
Other Agreements
|
A Certificate Holder's obligations will
be governed by the Certificate Holder Agreement between
the Certificate Holder and the Issuing CA.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.5
|
Authorized Relying Party Obligations,
Representations and Liability
|
Prior to relying on or using a TrustID
Certificate issued under this Policy, an Authorized
Relying Party is obligated to:
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.5.1
|
Use of Certificates For Appropriate Purpose
|
Ensure that the TrustID Certificate and
intended use are appropriate under the provisions of
this Policy;
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.5.2
|
Verification Responsibilities
|
Use the TrustID Certificate only in accordance
with the certification path validation procedure specified
in X.509 and PKIX; and
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.5.3
|
Revocation Check Responsibility
|
Check the status of the TrustID Certificate
by Online Status Check or against the appropriate and
current CRL, as applicable, in accordance with the requirements
stated in Section 4.10.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.5.4
|
Reasonable Reliance
|
For Digital Signatures created during
the Operational Period of a TrustID Certificate, an
Authorized Relying Party has a right to rely on the
Certificate only under circumstances constituting Reasonable
Reliance as defined in Section 1.1.2.1 of this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.5.5
|
Consequences of Relying on Revoked Certificate
|
If an Authorized Relying Party relies
on a TrustID Certificate that was expired or that the
Authorized Relying Party knew or should have known was
revoked at the time of reliance (e.g., a decision to
rely on a revoked TrustID Certificate based on the reasons
for revocation, information from other sources, or specific
business considerations pertaining to the Authorized
Relying Party), the Authorized Relying Party does so
at its own risk and, in so relying, waives any warranties
that any PKI Service Provider may have provided.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.5.6
|
Consequences of Breach
|
An Authorized Relying Party found to have
acted in a manner counter to these obligations will
forfeit all claims he, she or it may have against any
PKI Service Providers.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.5.7
|
Other Agreements
|
An Authorized Relying Party's obligations
will be governed by the Authorized Relying Party Agreement
between the Authorized Relying Party and the Issuing
CA.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.1.6
|
Repository Obligations, Representations
and Liability
|
A Repository is responsible for maintaining
a secure system for storing and retrieving Certificates,
a current copy, or a link to a current copy, of this
Policy, and other information relevant to Certificates,
and for providing information regarding the status of
Certificates as valid or invalid that can be determined
by an Authorized Relying Party.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.2
|
LIMITATION ON LIABILITY
|
This Policy establishes an open-but-bounded
PKI. PKI Service Providers will not be liable to any
person who relies upon a Certificate unless such liability
is clearly established by contract, special warranty
or law.
The total, maximum, aggregate liability
of an Issuing CA or RA for all TrustID Certificates
issued under this Policy and for all transactions relying
on TrustID Certificates is $10,000,000.
The maximum potential liability for an
Issuing CA or RA to any Authorized Relying Party with
respect to any one TrustID Certificate upon which the
Authorized Relying Party relies will be limited to:
(a) $100,000 per transaction; and (b) $250,000
for all transactions in which the Authorized Relying
Party relies on the TrustID Certificate. The Issuing
CA and RAs may limit their liability to a Certificate
Holder with respect to the Certificate Holder’s TrustID
Certificate to the amount received by the Issuing CA
and/or RA from the Certificate Holder with respect to
such TrustID Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.3
|
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.3.1
|
Insurance
|
|
|
2.3.1.1
|
Insurance Policy Required
|
Each Issuing CA and each RA will maintain
indemnity insurance coverage (e.g. "errors and
omissions," "cyber coverage," "network
computer liability," "professional liability,"
or other similar coverage) to protect End Entities for
any losses resulting from the activities of the Issuing
CA and/or RA under this Policy or any related agreement.
Issuing CAs shall obtain and maintain insurance coverage
of at least $10,000,000 in the aggregate for all Certificate-related
occurrences.
An Issuing CA may require that an RA maintains
professional liability error and omissions and crime
coverage insurance in adequate amounts and under terms
consistent with the policy terms applicable to an Issuing
CA, from an insurance company satisfactory to the Issuing
CA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3.1.2
|
Consequences of Failure to Meet Financial
Responsibilities
|
The failure of the Issuing CA or RA to
continuously maintain this indemnity insurance coverage
may be the basis for revocation or suspension of its
approval to participate in the issuance of Certificates
and may also be the basis for revocation of Certificates
previously issued.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.3.2
|
Administrative Processes A.D.R.
|
Participants may be required to participate
in, and bear financial responsibility for, a centrally-administrated
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process established
under Section 2.4.3.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.4
|
INTERPRETATION AND ENFORCEMENT
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.4.1
|
Governing Law
|
The enforceability, construction, interpretation,
and validity of this Policy will be governed by the
laws of the United States of America and the law of
the State of Utah, without regard to its conflicts of
law principles.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.4.2
|
Specific Provisions/ Incorporation of
Policy
|
The Issuing CA must ensure that its agreements
with RAs and End Entities contain appropriate provisions
that (i) incorporate the provisions of this Policy by
reference, or (ii) provide to the respective contracting
parties the protections established by this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.4.3
|
Dispute Resolution Procedures
|
In the event of any dispute or disagreement
between two or more Participants ("Disputing Parties")
arising out of or related to this Policy or a TrustID
Certificate, the Disputing Parties will use their best
efforts to settle the dispute or disagreement through
mediation or good faith negotiations following notice
from one Disputing Party to the other(s). If the Disputing
Parties cannot reach a mutually agreeable resolution
of the dispute or disagreement within sixty (60) days
following the date of such notice, then the Disputing
Parties will submit the dispute to binding arbitration.
The American Arbitration Association’s Rules for Commercial
Arbitration and Optional Rules for Emergency Measures
of Protection will apply to the proceedings.
This provision will not limit the right
of party to obtain other recourse and relief under any
applicable law for disputes or disagreements that do
not arise out of or which are not related to this Policy
or a TrustID Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.5
|
FEES
|
Notice of any fee charged to a Certificate
Holder or Authorized Relying Party must be brought to
the attention of that entity.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.5.1
|
Certificate Issuance, Renewal, and Revocation
Fees
|
Issuing CAs and RAs may establish and
charge a reasonable TrustID Certificate issuance fee
for providing I&A, registration and Certificate
issuance services to potential End Entities.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.5.2
|
Certificate Access Fees
|
The Issuing CA may establish and charge
a reasonable fee for providing TrustID Certificate status
information services.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.5.3
|
Revocation Status Information Access Fees
(Certificate Validation Services)
|
The Issuing CA may establish and charge
a reasonable fee for providing TrustID Certificate revocation
information services.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.5.4
|
Fees For Other Services Such As Policy
Information
|
The Issuing CA and RAs may establish and
charge other reasonable fees. However, no fee may be
charged for access to review the provisions of this
Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.5.5
|
Refund Policy
|
Any fees collected for Certificate applications
that are not approved will be refunded.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.6
|
NOTICE AND PUBLICATION
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.6.1
|
Publication of CA Information
|
Each Issuing CA will operate or cause
the operation of a secure online Repository that is
available to Authorized Relying Parties and that contains:
(i) issued TrustID Certificates; (ii) a CRL or online
Certificate status database (or both); (iii) the Issuing
CA's CA Certificate for its CA Private Signing Key;
(iv) past and current versions of the Issuing CA's CPS;
(v) a copy of this Policy; and (vi) other relevant information
relating to TrustID Certificates.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.6.2
|
Frequency of Publication
|
TrustID Certificates are published following
Acceptance by the Certificate Holder in accordance with
the procedure specified in Section 4.3. If the Issuing
CA elects to publish CRLs, the CRLs will be published
as specified in Section 4.10.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.6.3
|
Access Controls
|
The Issuing CA will not impose any access
controls on: (i) this Policy; (ii) the Issuing CA's
CA Certificate; and (iii) past and current versions
of the Issuing CA's CPS. The Issuing CA may impose access
controls on TrustID Certificates and Certificate status
information, in accordance with provisions of this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.6.4
|
Location
|
The location of publication will be one
appropriate to the Certificate-using community, in accordance
with the total security requirements, and will identify
an X.500 directory and an LDAP interface.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.6.5
|
Revocation Information
|
The sole source of information regarding
the validity or revocation of a TrustID Certificate
will be that provided by the Issuing CA pursuant to
an Authorized Relying Party contract. Revocation reason
codes should be provided through revocation mechanisms
(e.g., the reason Code in an X.509 Version 2 CRL). In
order to preserve trust in the PKI, the dissemination
of information concerning the events leading up to an
investigation of a revocation should be limited to those
involved.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.7
|
COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.7.1
|
Frequency
|
An Issuing CA will undergo a review and
approval process by the PMA to demonstrate compliance
with this Policy. This Policy makes no stipulation as
to the exact frequency of compliance inspections, but
inspections for re-certification will be required anytime
a significant change in Issuing CA operations is made.
In any event, the Issuing CA, RAs, and CMAs must certify
annually that they have at all times during the period
in question complied with the requirements of this Policy.
The Issuing CA, RAs, and CMAs must also state any periods
of non-compliance with this Policy and provide reasons
for non-compliance.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.7.2
|
Identity and Qualifications of Inspector
|
Any Compliance Inspectors must: (i) have
qualifications in accord with best commercial practice;
(ii) perform CA or Information System Security inspections
as their primary responsibility; and (iii) be familiar
with the Issuing CA's practices.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.7.3
|
Inspector's Neutrality
|
The Compliance Inspector(s) and CA must
have a contractual relationship for the performance
of the inspection, or be sufficiently separated organizationally
from the Issuing CA to provide an unbiased, independent
evaluation.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.7.4
|
Scope of Audit/Inspection
|
Inspections will be substantially similar
to: (i) the Common Criteria Protection Profile for Commercial
Security 2 published by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (CS2); (ii) a Report of Policies and
Procedures in Operation and Test of Operational Effectiveness
conducted pursuant to the guidance provided in the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ ("AICPA's")
Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) Number 70, Reports
on the Processing of Transactions by Service Organizations,
Type Two Review (SAS70); (iii) AICPA/CICA WebTrust for
Certification Authorities; and/or (iv) any other appropriate
standards as determined by the PMA.
Inspections must follow any guidelines
adopted by the PMA, including whether the Issuing CA’s
practices comply with the technical, procedural and
personnel policies and practices outlined in this Policy.
This inspection requirement does not require a review
of whether RAs implement and comply with technical,
procedural and personnel practices and policies set
forth in this Policy. An RA will conduct an internal
review of compliance with this Policy, certify compliance
to the Issuing CA on an annual basis, and be subject
to audits for security, systems and procedures by either
its regulator, licensing body, the Issuing CA or the
PMA.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.7.5
|
Actions Taken as a Result of Audit/Inspection
|
Issuing CA inspection results must be
submitted to the Issuing CA’s regulator or licensing
body where applicable, and the PMA. If irregularities
are found, the Issuing CA must submit a report to its
regulator or licensing body and the PMA as to any action
the Issuing CA will take in response to the inspection
report. Where the Issuing CA fails to take appropriate
action in response to the inspection report, the Issuing
CA’s regulator, licensing body or the PMA may: (i) indicate
the irregularities, but allow the Issuing CA to continue
operations until the next programmed inspection; (ii)
allow the Issuing CA to continue operations for a maximum
of thirty (30) days pending correction of any problems
prior to revocation; (iii) downgrade the assurance level
of any Certificates issued by the Issuing CA (including
Cross-Certificates); or (iv) revoke the Issuing CA's
Certificate. Any decision regarding which of these actions
to take will be based on the severity of the irregularities.
Any remedy may include permanent or temporary CA cessation,
but all relevant factors must be considered prior to
making a decision. A special audit may be required to
confirm the implementation and effectiveness of the
remedy. The Issuing CA will post any appropriate results
of an inspection, in whole or in part, so that it is
accessible for review by Certificate Holders, Authorized
Relying Parties and RAs. The manner and extent of the
publication will be defined by the Issuing CA.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8
|
PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION POLICY
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8.1
|
Sensitivity of Information
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8.1.1
|
Non-Private Information
|
TrustID Certificates and related status
information (including CRLs), and personal or Organization
information appearing in them or in public directories,
are not considered confidential. Information contained
on a single TrustID Certificate, and related status
information, will not be considered confidential when
the information is used in accordance with the purposes
of providing CA Services and carrying out the provisions
of this Policy. However, such information may not be
used by any non-Authorized Relying Party or for any
unauthorized purpose (e.g., mass, unsolicited e-mailings,
junk e-mail, spam, etc.). A TrustID Certificate should
only contain information that is relevant and necessary
to effect transactions with the Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8.1.2
|
Private Key Information
|
Private Keys are sensitive and confidential
information and, therefore, Private Keys should be held
in strictest confidence. Under no circumstances will
any Private Key appear unencrypted outside the Cryptomodule.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8.1.3
|
CA and RA Information
|
All non-public information stored locally
on Issuing CA and/or RA equipment (not in the Repository)
is considered confidential for purposes of this Policy.
Access to this information will be restricted to those
with an official need-to-know in order to perform their
official duties. Any information pertaining to Issuing
CA management of TrustID Certificates, such as compilations
of Certificate information, shall be treated as confidential.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8.2
|
Permitted Acquisition of Private Information
|
The Issuing CA or RA should collect only
such personal information about an End Entity or Sponsoring
Organization that is necessary for the issuance of a
TrustID Certificate to the End Entity. For the purpose
of proper administration of TrustID Certificates, the
Issuing CA or RA may request non-Certificate information
to be used in issuing and managing Certificates (e.g.,
identifying numbers, business or home addresses and
telephone numbers). But such information will only be
used for purposes of Certificate management and issuance.
Collection of personal information may be subject to
collection, maintenance, retention and protection requirements
of state and federal law.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8.3
|
Opportunity of Owner to Correct Private
Information
|
End Entities must be given access and
the ability to correct or modify their personal or Organization
information. The Issuing CA or RA must provide this
information on appropriate request, but only after taking
proper steps to authenticate the identity of the requesting
party.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8.4
|
Release of Information to Third Parties
|
PKI Service Providers will not disclose
any information deemed confidential under this Section
2.8, to any third party, except when: (i) authorized
by this Policy; (ii) required to disclose by law, governmental
rule or regulation, or court order; or (iii) when necessary
to effect an appropriate use of a TrustID Certificate.
All requests for disclosure of information considered
confidential under this Section 2.8 must be made in
writing. The Issuing CA may choose to further define
or restrict its disclosure of Certificate-related information.
Unless prohibited by law, a PKI Service Provider will
give all interested persons or parties reasonable prior
written notice before disclosing any information considered
confidential under this Section 2.8. Non-disclosure
of confidential information will remain an obligation
notwithstanding the status of a TrustID Certificate
(current or revoked) or the status of the Issuing CA.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.9
|
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
|
A Private Key will be treated as the sole
property of the legitimate holder of the TrustID Certificate
containing the corresponding Public Key. "TrustID"
is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
as a mark of Digital Signature Trust Co. This Policy,
its OID and the TrustID mark are the intellectual property
of DST, protected by trademark, copyright and other
laws regarding intellectual property, and may be used
only pursuant to a license or other express permission
from DST and only in accordance with the provisions
of this Policy. Any other use of the above without the
express written permission of the owner is expressly
prohibited.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.10
|
LEGAL VALIDITY OF CERTIFICATES
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.10.1
|
Issuance
|
To be legally valid, a TrustID Certificate
must be issued in accordance with this Policy and any
applicable law.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.10.2
|
Acceptance
|
The act of Acceptance will be logged by
the Issuing CA and may consist of a record made when
the End Entity downloads the Certificate. Such act will
be recorded and maintained in an auditable trail kept
by the Issuing CA in a trustworthy manner that comports
with industry standards and any applicable laws or provisions
of this Policy or related agreements.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.10.3
|
Operational Period
|
A revoked or expired TrustID Certificate
may not be used for any purpose. No action taken by
an Authorized Relying Party will be considered valid
for purposes of this PKI unless the Authorized Relying
Party's Digital Signature verification request is able
to confirm that the Digital Signature in question was
created during the Operational Period of a valid TrustID
Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
|
2.10.4
|
Rule of Repose Allowing Ultimate Termination
of Certificate
|
Unless otherwise specified by the Parties,
reliance on a TrustID Certificate is no longer enforceable
by an Authorized Relying Party against the Issuing CA
or RA four months after termination of the applicable
Authorized Relying Party Agreement or two (2) years
after the Authorized Relying Party’s validation of the
TrustID Certificate with the Issuing CA's Repository,
whichever occurs first.
|
| |
|
|
|
3
|
IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHENTICATION
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1
|
INITIAL REGISTRATION
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
Identification and Authentication
|
The Issuing CA is responsible for performing
the I&A of End Entities prior to the issuance of
TrustID Certificates. The Issuing CA may perform I&A
itself, or may designate one or more persons to act
as RA. RAs may designate one or more employees or agents,
to be referred to as Local Registration Agents, to perform
I&A in accordance with this Part 3. If applications
are transmitted electronically, via e-mail or a web-site,
the transmissions must be secure (e.g., SSL or similar
protocol); otherwise, applications should be submitted
by first class U.S. mail or in person.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.2
|
Types of Names
|
The Subject Name used for TrustID Certificates
shall be the End Entity’s authenticated common name.
Each End Entity must have a clearly distinguishable
and unique X.501 Distinguished Name ("DN")
in the Certificate Subject Name field and in accordance
with PKIX Part 1. The DN must be in the form of an X.501
printable string and must not be blank.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.2.1
|
Need for Names to be Meaningful
|
The contents of each Certificate Subject
and Name fields must have an association with the authenticated
name of the End Entity. In the case of Individuals,
the authenticated common name should be a combination
of first name, surname, and optionally initials. For
Affiliated Individuals, the DN may also include an Organization
position or role. In the case of End Entities that are
Organizations, the DN will reflect the authenticated
legal name of the End Entity. Where a Certificate refers
to a role or position, the Certificate must also contain
the identity of the person who holds that role or position.
A Certificate issued for an Electronic Device must include
the authenticated name of the Electronic Device and/or
name of the responsible Individual or Organization.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.2.2
|
Rules for Interpreting Various Name Forms
|
The Issuing CA may defer to a naming authority
for guidance on name interpretation and subordination.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.2.3
|
Uniqueness Of Names
|
The Subject Name listed in a TrustID Certificate
shall be unambiguous and unique for all TrustID Certificates
issued by the Issuing CA and conform to X.500 standards
for name uniqueness. If necessary, additional numbers
or letters may be appended to the real name to ensure
the name's uniqueness within the domain of TrustID Certificates
issued by the Issuing CA. No wildcard name forms are
allowed. Each name shall be unique and for a single
unique entity.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.2.4
|
Name Claim Dispute Resolution Procedure
|
The Issuing CA should reserve the right
to make all decisions regarding End Entity names in
TrustID Certificates. If necessary, a party requesting
a TrustID Certificate may be required to demonstrate
its right to use a particular name. The Issuing CA will
investigate and correct if necessary any name collisions
brought to its attention. If appropriate, the Issuing
CA will coordinate with and defer to the appropriate
naming authority.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.2.5
|
Use of Names and Trademarks
|
An End Entity is not guaranteed that its
Distinguished Name or Subject Name will contain any
requested trademark. The Issuing CA is not required
to subsequently issue a new TrustID Certificate to the
rightful owner of any name if the Issuing CA has already
issued to that owner a TrustID Certificate containing
a DN and Subject Name that are sufficient for identification
within the PKI. The Issuing CA is not obligated to seek
evidence of trademarks or court orders.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.3
|
Method to Prove Possession of Private
Key
|
Applicants are required to prove possession
of the Private Key corresponding to the Public Key in
a Certificate request, which may be done by signing
the request with the Private Key. The Issuing CA shall
establish that the Applicant is in possession of the
Private Key corresponding to the Public Key submitted
with the application in accordance with an appropriate
secure protocol, such as that described in the IETF
PKIX Certificate Management Protocol. In the case where
the Private Key is generated directly on a Token, or
in a Key generator that benignly transfers the Key to
a Token, then the End Entity is deemed to be in possession
of the Private Key at the time of generation or transfer.
If the End Entity is not in possession of the Token
when the Key is generated, then the Token will be delivered
immediately to the End Entity via a trustworthy and
accountable method (see Section 6.1.2).
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.4
|
Authentication of Organization Identity
|
Requests by an Organization for Certificates
may be made electronically and must include the Organization's
legal name and address. The minimum I&A required
of an Organization under this Policy requires confirmation
that: (i) the Organization legally exists and has conducted
business from the address listed in the Certificate
application; and (ii) the information contained in the
Certificate application is correct. When I&A is
performed by an RA, the RA will conduct I&A in accordance
with its "Know Your Customer" policy or other
similar procedures, which may include a review of official
government records and/or engagement of a reputable
third party vendor of business information to provide
validation information concerning the Organization applying
for the Certificate, such as: (i) legal company name;
(ii) type of entity; (iii) year of formation;
(iv) names of directors and officers; (v) address; (vi) telephone
number; and (vii) proof good standing in the jurisdiction
where the applicant is incorporated or otherwise organized.
Organization information should also be
verified by checking with reporting agencies and the
Organization’s financial institution references, and
by calling the Organization’s telephone number. Disconnected
phone service and other insufficient, false, or suspicious
information provided by the Organization warrants further
investigation. If requested follow-up information is
not forthcoming, or if an Applicant refuses to produce
such any requested information, the Certificate application
should not be approved. The RA may rely on information
previously obtained concerning the Organization and
will keep a record of the type and details of information
used for verifying identity. Such procedures will not
conflict with other stipulations of this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.5
|
Certificates for Affiliated Individuals
|
An Organization’s Certificates will be
issued to Affiliated Individuals whenever possible.
For those cases where there are several individuals
acting in one capacity, a Certificate may be issued
in the Organization's name. In these cases, the Organization
is responsible and assumes liability related to maintaining
a list of Individuals authorized to use the Organization’s
Certificate(s). The name of the person to whom the Organization’s
Token is issued will be retained by the Issuing CA and
RA, and the Organization is responsible for ensuring
control of these Certificates and their associated Private
Keys and accounting for who had control of the Keys
and when.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.7
|
In-Person and Electronic Authentication
of Individual Identity
|
Individuals seeking issuance of a TrustID
Certificate that apply in person may submit any of the
following individual identity items, which the Issuing
CA or RA will cross-check for consistency:
-
a currently-valid, state-issued photo
identification card or driver's license;
-
a U.S.-issued passport or military
ID;
-
an alien registration card;
-
a current college photo identification
card;
-
a currently-valid major credit card;
-
an employer identification card (with
employer name and street address);
-
a social security number; and
-
a utility bill with a matching name
and address.
|
| |
|
In order for the Issuing CA or RA to approve
an application, the Applicant must present at least
one form of photo identification from the list above.
Alternatively, the Issuing CA or RA may
authenticate Individuals by electronic means. Where
the CA or RA performs I&A through electronic means,
the CA or RA will request that the applicant submit
at least his, her or its name, address, telephone number,
e-mail address, Social Security number, and state-issued
photo identification card number, or their equivalent.
In the alternative, if (i) the RA has
previously established the identity of an Individual,
(ii) the RA and Individual possess a Shared Secret
(e.g., an account PIN), and (iii) the RA and the
Individual have an ongoing business relationship sufficient
to satisfy the RA of the Individual’s identity, then
the RA and the Individual may utilize the Shared Secret
to satisfy the I&A requirements of this Policy and
to process the request for a TrustID Certificate. The
RA will ensure that it has collected or reviewed, and
kept records of the type and details of, information
regarding the individual’s identity that meets the minimum
requirements of its "Know Your Customer" policy,
or other similar procedures, which may include verification
of all of the following identification information supplied
by the Applicant: (i) first name, middle initial, and
last name; (ii) street address; and (iii) home or work
telephone number.
The RA should determine whether it has
a record of the Applicant's persistent street address
and verification of a telephone number by calling the
Applicant’s residence or place of employment. Disconnected
phone service, no record of employment, or other insufficient,
false, or suspicious information provided by the Individual
warrant further investigation. If requested follow-up
information is not forthcoming, or if an Applicant refuses
to produce any requested information, the Certificate
application should not be approved.
Information may also be verified by checking
with reporting agencies, other third party vendors of
such information or the Individual’s financial institution
references,
Such procedures will not conflict with
other stipulations of this Policy.
The Issuing CA must ensure that the Applicant's
identity information and Public Key are adequately bound.
This association may be established by the use of a
Shared Secret (e.g., a password, code or number), exchanged
between the RA, the Applicant and the Issuing CA. If
a Shared Secret is used, care must be taken to ensure
that the Applicant and the Issuing CA or RA are the
only recipients of the Shared Secret. If an account
PIN is used, the RA should not provide it to the Issuing
CA. Other mechanisms to achieve such binding may also
include the use of a PKI-wide database, system account,
or similar authentication mechanisms
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.8
|
Affiliated Individuals
|
Affiliated Individuals may be authenticated
by following the procedures identified in 3.1.6 and
3.1.7 and by confirming with the Sponsoring Organization
that the Individual has the affiliation alleged in the
Certificate application.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.9
|
Authorized Relying Parties
|
I&A of Authorized Relying Parties
may be performed by the Issuing CA and RAs as a consequence
of the enrollment process by which an Authorized Relying
Party enters into an Authorized Relying Party Agreement
with the Issuing CA.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.1.10
|
Electronic Devices
|
A TrustID Certificate request identifying
an Electronic Device as the subject of a Certificate
may be made by an approved End Entity for whom the Electronic
Device's signature is attributable for the purposes
of accountability and responsibility. I&A must follow
this Policy's requirements as if the End Entity were
applying for the Certificate on his, her or its own
behalf. The Certificate will be revoked if the End Entity’s
Certificate is revoked. This type of Certificate can
only be issued by an Issuing CA that can ensure accomplishment
of such revocation.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2
|
CERTIFICATE RE-KEY, RENEWAL, AND UPDATE
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.1
|
Certificate Re-Key
|
As long as an End Entity’s TrustID Certificate
has not been revoked, the End Entity may, within three
months prior to the end of the TrustID Certificate's
Validity Period, request issuance of a new TrustID Certificate
with a new Key Pair. Such a request must be made to
the Issuing CA or RA that originally issued or authorized
the TrustID Certificate, and may be made electronically
via a Digitally Signed message based on the old Key
Pair in the original TrustID Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.2
|
Certificate Renewal
|
Renewing a TrustID Certificate means creating
a new TrustID Certificate with the same name, Public
Key, and authorizations as the old one, but a new, extended
Validity Period and a new serial number. A Certificate
may be renewed if the Key Pair has not reached the end
of its validity, the Private Key has not been compromised,
and the End Entity name and attributes are correct.
Thus, the Issuing CA may choose to implement a three-year
re-key period with an initial issue and two annual renewals
before re-key is required. The old Certificate need
not be revoked, but must not be further re-keyed, renewed,
or updated.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.3
|
Certificate Update
|
Updating a TrustID Certificate means creating
a new TrustID Certificate that: (i) has the same or
a different Public Key, (ii) has a different serial
number, and (iii) differs in one or more other fields
from the old Certificate. For example, the Issuing CA
may choose to update a TrustID Certificate of a Certificate
Holder who gains an authorization. The old Certificate
may or may not be revoked, but must not be further re-keyed,
renewed, or updated.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.4
|
Re-Key, Renewal or Update of Affiliated
Individual Certificate
|
Re-key, renewal or update of the TrustID
Certificate of an Affiliated Individual will require
that the affiliation between the Affiliated Individual
and his or her Sponsoring Organization still exists.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.3
|
RE-KEY AFTER REVOCATION OR EXPIRATION
|
Revoked or expired TrustID Certificates
may not be re-keyed, renewed or updated. Applicants
with revoked or expired TrustID Certificates will, upon
reapplication, be subject to the same I&A procedures
as first-time Applicants.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.4
|
REVOCATION REQUEST
|
An End Entity may request revocation of
his, her or its TrustID Certificate at any time for
any reason. The Issuing CA, when faced with such a request,
must adopt authentication mechanisms that balance the
need to prevent unauthorized requests against the need
to quickly revoke TrustID Certificates. Therefore, in
the event the request is electronically submitted, the
identity of the requestor may be authenticated on the
basis of the Digital Signature used to submit the message.
If the request is signed using the Private Key corresponding
to the requestor's Public Key, such a request will always
be accepted as valid.
|
| |
|
|
4
|
CERTIFICATE LIFE CYCLE OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
|
| |
|
|
|
4.1
|
CERTIFICATE REQUEST
|
This Policy is not intended to impose
implementation requirements on the Issuing CA or End
Entities. However, this Policy does identify the required
information and procedures that constitute assurance
and support trust in the PKI. To this end, the Policy
endorses the following procedures for satisfying the
security requirements of this PKI. The following steps
are required when applying for a TrustID Certificate:
(i) establish identity of subject (per Section
3); (ii) obtain a Key Pair for each TrustID Certificate
required; (iii) prove to the Issuing CA that the Public
Key forms a functioning Key Pair with the Private Key
held by the End Entity; and (iv) provide a point of
contact for verification of any roles or authorizations
requested.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.1.1
|
Who Can Request a Certificate
|
The Certificate application process may
be initiated by Individuals or Organizations.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.1.2
|
Certificate Request Process
|
Applicants will complete a Certificate
application and provide requested information in a form
prescribed by the Issuing CA in accordance with this
Policy. An Applicant must also enter into a Certificate
Agreement or Authorized Relying Party Agreement with
the Issuing CA. All applications are subject to review,
approval and acceptance by the Issuing CA.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.1.3
|
Time to Process a Certificate Request
|
There is no stipulation for the period
between the receipt of an application for a Certificate
and its issuance. However, the Issuing CA should respond
promptly to all such applications.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.2
|
CERTIFICATE APPLICATION VALIDATION
|
No stipulation
|
| |
|
|
|
4.3
|
CERTIFICATE ISSUANCE
|
After all application and approval processes
identified in this Policy are completed, the Issuing
CA will: (i) issue the requested TrustID Certificate;
(ii) notify the Applicant of the TrustID Certificate's
issuance; and (iii) make the TrustID Certificate available
to the Applicant for Acceptance. The procedures for
notifying the Applicant of the TrustID Certificate's
issuance, and the procedure used to deliver or make
the Certificate available to the Applicant must be secure
and confidential.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.4
|
CERTIFICATE ACCEPTANCE
|
An End Entity’s Acceptance of its TrustID
Certificate will be a pre-condition to the End Entity’s
use of such TrustID Certificate. The Issuing CA will
define in its agreements with End Entities (or in its
CPS, if incorporated by reference in its agreements
with End Entities) the procedure that constitutes Acceptance
by an End Entity. The process of issuance, notification
and Acceptance, and the mechanisms used, may depend
on factors such as where the Key Pair is generated and
how the TrustID Certificate is made available to the
End Entity. By Accepting a TrustID Certificate, the
End Entity warrants that all of the information provided
by the End Entity (and by its Sponsoring Organization,
where applicable) and included in the TrustID Certificate,
and all representations made by the End Entity (and
by its Sponsoring Organization, where applicable) as
part of the application and I&A process, are true
and not misleading.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.5
|
NOTIFICATION OF CERTIFICATE ISSUANCE TO
OTHERS
|
Notification of Certificate issuance to
others may be effectuated by publication of the TrustID
Certificate in a recognized Repository.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.6
|
CERTIFICATE USAGE
|
TrustID Certificates may not be used for
purposes counter to the principles and applications
outlined in this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.7
|
PROCESSING A REQUEST FOR A NEW KEY
|
|
| |
|
|
|
4.7.1
|
Circumstances For Request of A New Key
Certification
|
A request for new Key certification may
be made to expedite certification of a new Key Pair
to (i) replace an existing Certificate revoked for a
reason other than Key compromise, (ii) replace an existing
Certificate revoked for Key compromise, pursuant to
Section 4.7.3; or (iii) obtain a second Certificate
with a different Distinguished Name, attribute or assurance
level.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.7.2
|
Who Can Request
|
Only the End Entity may request certification
of a new Key.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.7.3
|
Treatment of a Request for Certification
of a New Key
|
If out of band processes are in place
to authenticate an End Entity (such as a Shared Secret
or bio-metric means of identity verification), it is
not necessary for an Issuing CA or RA to subject the
request to a complete re-certification, even if the
Private Key has been compromised
|
| |
|
|
|
4.7.4
|
Notification of Certification Request
For A New Key To End Entity
|
The notification procedures used by the
Issuing CA or RA should be the same as with a new End
Entity request.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.8
|
CERTIFICATE MODIFICATIONS
|
The Issuing CA may allow for Certificate
modification for any of the following changes during
the Certificate's Operational Period: (i) legal name
due to marriage, divorce or court petition; (ii) Organizational
affiliation; (iii) location information; (iv) e-mail
address; or (v) any attribute/extension of a Certificate.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.9
|
CERTIFICATE REVOCATION
|
|
| |
|
|
|
4.9.1
|
Circumstances for Revocation
|
|
|
4.9.1.1
|
Permissive Revocation
|
An End Entity may request revocation of
his, her or its TrustID Certificate at any time for
any reason. A Sponsoring Organization may request revocation
of a TrustID Certificate issued to an Affiliated Individual
of the Sponsoring Organization, at any time for any
reason. The Issuing CA may revoke a TrustID Certificate
for any reason, including without limitation the failure
of the End Entity (or any Sponsoring Organization, where
applicable) to meet its obligations under this Policy,
the applicable CPS, or any other agreement, regulation,
or law applicable to the TrustID Certificate that may
be in force. This includes revoking a TrustID Certificate
when the Issuing CA suspects that a compromise of the
corresponding Private Key has occurred.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.9.1.2
|
Required Revocation
|
An End Entity or a Sponsoring Organization
(where applicable) will promptly request revocation
of a TrustID Certificate whenever: (i) any of the information
in the TrustID Certificate changes or becomes obsolete;
(ii) the Private Key, or the media holding the Private
Key, associated with the TrustID Certificate is known
or suspected of being compromised; or (iii) an Affiliated
Individual is no longer affiliated with a Sponsoring
Organization. The Issuing CA will revoke a TrustID Certificate:
(i) upon request of the End Entity (or Sponsoring
Organization, where applicable); (ii) upon failure
of the End Entity (or the Sponsoring Organization, where
applicable) to meet its material obligations under this
Policy, any applicable CPS, or any other agreement,
regulation, or law that may be in force that is applicable
to the TrustID Certificate; (iii) if knowledge or reasonable
suspicion of compromise is obtained; or (iv) if the
Issuing CA determines that the TrustID Certificate was
not properly issued in accordance with this Policy and/or
any applicable CPS.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.9.2
|
Who Can Request Revocation
|
The Issuing CA may summarily revoke Certificates
within its domain. An RA can request the revocation
of an End Entity’s TrustID Certificate on behalf of
the End Entity, the Sponsoring Organization, or other
authorized party, or on its own behalf. An End Entity
is authorized to request the revocation of his, her
or its own Certificate, as is a Certificate Holder's
Sponsoring Organization. In any case, notice should
be provided to the End Entity promptly after revocation.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.9.3
|
Procedure For Revocation Request
|
As described in this Policy, a Certificate
revocation request should be promptly communicated to
the Issuing CA, either directly or through the RA authorized
to accept such notices on behalf of the Issuing CA.
A Certificate revocation request may be communicated
electronically if it is Digitally Signed with the Private
Key of the End Entity (or of the Sponsoring Organization,
where applicable). Alternatively, the End Entity (or
Sponsoring Organization, where applicable) may request
revocation by contacting the Issuing CA or its RA in
person and providing adequate proof of identification
in accordance with this Policy or an equivalent method.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.9.4
|
Time to Process a Revocation
|
The Issuing CA shall revoke a TrustID
Certificate as quickly as practical after receipt of
a proper revocation request and confirmation of the
authority of the person requesting revocation. The Issuing
CA may suspend a TrustID Certificate prior to making
a determination on whether to revoke it. Promptly following
revocation of a TrustID Certificate, the Issuing CA
shall update the online Certificate database and/or
CRL, as applicable. All revocation requests and the
resulting actions taken by the Issuing CA will be archived.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.9.5
|
Revocation Checking Requirements
|
Use of revoked TrustID Certificates could
have damaging or catastrophic consequences in certain
applications. Therefore, before relying on a TrustID
Certificate an Authorized Relying Party must conduct
a validation request in accordance with the method and
procedures established by the Issuing CA pursuant to
Section 4.10. If it is temporarily infeasible to obtain
revocation information, then the Authorized Relying
Party must either reject use of the TrustID Certificate,
or make an informed decision to accept the risk, responsibility
and consequences of using a TrustID Certificate whose
authenticity cannot be guaranteed to the standards of
this Policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10
|
CERTIFICATE STATUS SERVICES
|
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10.1
|
Certificate Status Checking Methods
|
Each Issuing CA shall provide one or more
secure, trustworthy methods for Authorized Relying Parties
to verify the validity and status of TrustID Certificates,
which shall include either (i) CRLs, and/or (ii) an
online Certificate status database. Where an Issuing
CA makes available to Authorized Relying Parties more
than one method of verifying the validity and status
of TrustID Certificates, it may establish one of the
methods as the primary method, and may disclaim all
warranties and liability to any Authorized Relying Party
to the extent the Authorized Relying Party uses the
other method(s).
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10.2
|
Certificate Revocation Lists
|
When an Issuing CA provides CRLs as a
method of verifying the validity and status of TrustID
Certificates, the following requirements will apply:
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10.2.1
|
CRL Issuance Frequency
|
CRLs will be issued at least weekly, even
if there are no changes or updates to be made, to ensure
timeliness of information. If there are circumstances
under which the Issuing CA will post early updates,
these will be spelled out in a CPS or in the Authorized
Relying Party Agreements used by the Issuing CA. The
Issuing CA will ensure that superceded CRLs are removed
from the directory system upon posting of the latest
CRL.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10.2.2
|
CRL Checking Requirements
|
Authorized Relying Parties who rely on
a CRL must in their validation requests check a current,
valid CRL for the Issuing CA in the Certificate path
and obtain a current CRL.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10.2.3
|
CRL Latency
|
Authorized Relying Parties who rely on
a CRL must (i) check for an interim CRL before relying
on a TrustID Certificate, and (ii) log their validation
requests. Failure to do so negates the ability of the
Authorized Relying Party to claim that it acted on the
TrustID Certificate with Reasonable Reliance. Interim
CRLs will only be made available to Authorized Relying
Parties.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10.3
|
Online Status Checking
|
When an Issuing CA provides an online
Certificate status database as a method of verifying
the validity and status of TrustID Certificates, the
following requirements will apply:
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10.3.1
|
Online Revocation/Status Checking Availability
|
The Issuing CA will validate online, near-real-time
the status of the TrustID Certificate indicated in a
Certificate validation request message.
|
|
4.10.3.2
|
Online Revocation Checking Requirements
|
Authorized Relying Parties who rely on
an online Certificate status databse must (i) validate
a TrustID Certificate with such database before relying
on the Certificate, and (ii) log the validation request.
Failure to do so negates the ability of the Authorized
Relying Party to claim that it acted on the TrustID
Certificate with Reasonable Reliance.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.10.4
|
Other Forms of Revocation Advertisements
Available
|
An Issuing CA may also use other methods
to publicize revoked TrustID Certificates.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.11
|
END OF SUBSCRIPTION
|
No stipulation.
|
| |
|
|
|
4.12
|
PRIVATE KEY RECOVERY
|
If a Key Pair is used for both signature
and confidentiality purposes, recovery of the Private
Key is prohibited unless the Issuing CA provides mechanisms
(hardware, software or procedural) that permit recovery
of the Private Key while protecting it from being used
to impersonate the End Entity.
|
|
5
|
CA FACILITY AND MANAGEMENT CONTROLS
|
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1
|
PHYSICAL CONTROLS
|
The Issuing CA, and all RAs, CMAs and
Repositories, will implement appropriate physical security
controls to restrict access to the hardware and software
(including the server, workstations, and any external
cryptographic hardware modules or Tokens) used in connection
with providing CA services. Access to such hardware
and software will be limited to those personnel performing
in a Trusted Role as described in Section 5.2.1. Access
will be controlled through the use of electronic access
controls, mechanical combination locksets, or deadbolts.
Such access controls must be manually or electronically
monitored for unauthorized intrusion at all times.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1.1
|
Site Location and Construction
|
The site for the Issuing CA's server must
satisfy the requirements for a High-Security Zone, including:
(i) be manually or electronically monitored for
unauthorized intrusion at all times; (ii) ensure
that access to the Issuing CA server is limited to those
personnel identified on an access list and implement
dual access control requirements to the Issuing CA server
for such personnel; (iii) ensure personnel not on the
access list are properly escorted and supervised; (iv)
ensure a site access log is maintained and inspected
periodically; and (v) ensure all removable media and
paper containing sensitive plain text information are
stored in secure, protective containers.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
All RA sites must be located in areas
that satisfy the controls required for a Reception Zone.
If an RA workstation is used for online entity management
with the Issuing CA, the workstation must be located
in either: (i) a Security Zone; or (ii) an Operations
Zone while attended, with all media security protected
when unattended. The Issuing CA must ensure that the
operation of the RA's site provides appropriate security
protection of the Cryptomodule, all system software
and Private Keys. For example, the Cryptomodule and
the RA’s Private Key should be stored in a secure container
or safe. Where a PIN or password is recorded, it must
be stored in a security container accessible only to
designated personnel. Employees of RAs must not leave
their workstations unattended when the cryptography
is in an unlocked state (i.e., when the PIN or password
has been entered). A workstation that contains Private
Keys on a hard drive must be physically secured or protected
with an appropriate access control product. Hardware
Cryptomodules must be protected physically, which may
be done through site protection.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1.2
|
Physical Access
|
Issuing CA equipment will always be protected
from unauthorized access. Authenticating RA equipment
will be protected from unauthorized access while the
Cryptomodule is installed and activated. The RA will
implement physical access controls to reduce the risk
of equipment tampering even when the Cryptomodule is
not installed and activated. These security mechanisms
will be commensurate with the level of threat in the
RA equipment environment. For example, RA equipment
in facilities with controlled access occupied primarily
by security personnel will not require an additional
layer of controlled access surrounding inactivated RA
equipment. RA equipment in less secure environments
will require additional protection, such as being located
in a room that is kept locked when the RA security or
authorized personnel are not present. Removable CA Cryptomodules
will be inactivated and placed in locked containers
sufficient for housing equipment commensurate with the
classification, sensitivity, or value level of the information
being protected by the Certificates issued. Any Activation
Data used to access or enable the Cryptomodule or Issuing
CA equipment will be stored separately. Such information
should be memorized and not written down. If such information
is written, it must be securely stored in a locked container.
A security check to the facility housing
Issuing CA equipment will occur at least once every
24 hours. The check should ensure that: (i) the equipment
is in a state appropriate to the current mode of operation
(e.g., that Cryptomodules and removable hard disks are
in place when "open", and secured when "closed");
(ii) any security containers are properly secured;
(iii) physical security systems (e.g., door locks, vent
covers) are functioning properly; and (iv) the area
is secured against unauthorized access. A role or person
will be made explicitly responsible for making such
checks. When a role is responsible, a log identifying
the individual performing such a check will be maintained.
A record will be kept that describes the type of checks
performed, the time, and the person who performed them.
If the Issuing CA equipment is located in a continuously
attended facility, there will be a security check once
per shift. If the facility is not continuously attended,
the last person to depart will initial a sign-out sheet
that asserts that the facility entrance door is locked
and that, where installed, intrusion detection systems
are activated. If the facility housing the Issuing CA
equipment will be unattended for periods greater than
24 hours, it will be protected by an intrusion detection
system. Additionally, a check will be made at least
once every 24 hours to ensure that all doors to the
facility are locked and there have been no attempts
at forceful entry.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1.3
|
Power and Air Conditioning
|
The facility which houses the Issuing
CA equipment will be supplied with power and air conditioning
sufficient to create a reliable operating environment.
In addition, personnel areas within the facility must
be supplied with sufficient utilities to satisfy operational,
health, and safety needs. The actual quantity and quality
of utility service will depend on how the facility operates,
e.g., its times of operation (24 hours/7 days or 8 hours/5
days), or whether online Certificate status checking
is provided. The Issuing CA equipment will have backup
capability sufficient to automatically lockout input,
finish any pending actions, and record the state of
the equipment before lack of power or air conditioning
causes a shutdown. The revocation mechanisms will be
supported by uninterruptable power supplies and sufficient
backup power generation.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1.4
|
Water Exposures
|
This Policy makes no stipulation on prevention
of exposure of Issuing CA equipment to water beyond
that called for by best business practice. Issuing CA
equipment will be installed such that it is not in danger
of exposure to water, e.g., on tables or elevated floors.
Moisture detectors will be installed in areas susceptible
to flooding. CA operators who have sprinklers for fire
control will have a contingency plan for recovery should
the sprinklers malfunction, or cause water damage outside
of the fire area.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1.5
|
Fire Prevention and Protection
|
This Policy makes no stipulation on prevention
of exposure of Issuing CA equipment to fire beyond that
called for by best business practice. An automatic fire
extinguishing system will be installed in accordance
with local code. The Issuing CA will have a contingency
plan, which accounts for damage by fire.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1.6
|
Media Storage
|
Media will be stored so as to protect
it from accidental damage (water, fire, electromagnetic).
Media that contains audit, archive, or backup information
will be stored in a location separate from the Issuing
CA equipment.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1.7
|
Waste Disposal
|
Normal office waste will be removed or
destroyed in accordance with best business practices.
Media used to collect or transmit information discussed
in Section 2.8 will be destroyed, such that the information
is unrecoverable, prior to disposal.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.1.8
|
Off-Site Backup
|
System backups, sufficient to recover
from system failure, will be made on a periodic schedule,
described in the CPS. At least one backup copy will
be stored at an offsite location (separate from the
Issuing CA equipment). Only the latest backup need be
retained. The backup will be stored at a site with physical
and procedural controls commensurate to that of the
operational CA system.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.2
|
PROCEDURAL CONTROLS
|
|
| |
|
|
|
5.2.1
|
Trusted Roles
|
A Trusted Role is one whose incumbent
performs functions that can introduce security problems
if not carried out properly, whether accidentally or
maliciously. The people selected to fill Trusted Roles
must be careful and above reproach as described in the
next Section. The functions performed in Trusted Roles
form the basis of trust in the entire PKI.
|
| |
|
|
|
5.2.2 |
Number of Persons Required per Task |
The Issuing CA will utilize commercially reasonable practices to
ensure that one person acting alone cannot circumvent safeguards.
The Issuing CA must ensure that no single individual may gain
access to End Entity Private Keys stored by the Issuing CA. At a
minimum, procedural or operational mechanisms must be in place for
key recovery, such as a Split-Knowledge Technique, to prevent the
disclosure of the encryption key to an unauthorized individual.
Multi-user control is also required for CA Key generation as
outlined in Section 6.2.2. All other duties associated with CA roles
may be performed by an individual operating alone. The Issuing CA
must ensure that any verification process it employs provides for
oversight of all activities performed by privileged CA role holders.
To best ensure the integrity of the Issuing CA equipment and
operation, it is recommended that wherever possible a separate
individual be identified for each Trusted Role. The separation
provides a set of checks and balances over the Issuing CA operation.
Under no circumstances will the incumbent of a CA role perform his
or her own auditor function. |
| |
|
|
|
5.2.3 |
Identification and Authentication for Each Role |
All Issuing CA personnel must have their identity and
authorization verified before they are: (i) included in the access
list for the Issuing CA site; (ii) included in the access list for
physical access to the Issuing CA system; (iii) given a Certificate
for the performance of their CA role; or (iv) given an account on
the PKI system. Each of these Certificates and accounts (with the
exception of CA signing Certificates) must: (i) be directly
attributable to an individual; (ii) not be shared; and (iii) be
restricted to actions authorized for that role through the use of CA
software, operating system and procedural controls. When accessed
across shared networks, CA operations must be secured, using
mechanisms such as token-based strong authentication and encryption. |
| |
|
|
|
5.3 |
PERSONNEL CONTROLS |
|
| |
|
|
|
5.3.1 |
Background Qualifications Experience and Clearance Requirements |
Issuing CAs, RAs, CMAs, and Repositories will formulate and
follow personnel and management policies sufficient to provide
reasonable assurance of the trustworthiness and competence of their
employees and of the satisfactory performance of their duties in
manner consistent with this Policy. |
| |
|
|
|
5.3.2 |
Background Check Procedures |
Issuing CAs will conduct an appropriate investigation of all
personnel who serve in Trusted Roles (prior to their employment and
periodically thereafter as necessary), to verify their
trustworthiness and competence in accordance with the requirements
of this Policy and the Issuing CA's personnel practices or
equivalent. All personnel who fail an initial or periodic
investigation will not serve or continue to serve in a Trusted Role. |
| |
|
|
|
5.3.3 |
Training Requirements |
The Issuing CA must ensure that all personnel performing
managerial duties with respect to the operation of the Issuing CA
and RAs receive comprehensive training in: (i) the Issuing CA/RA
security principles and mechanisms; (ii) security awareness; (iii)
all PKI software versions in use on the Issuing CA system; (iv) all
duties they are expected to perform; and (v) disaster recovery and
business continuity procedures. |
| |
|
|
|
5.3.4 |
Retraining Frequency and Requirements |
The requirements of Section 5.3.3 must be kept current to
accommodate changes in the Issuing CA system. Refresher training
must be conducted as required, and the Issuing CA must review these
requirements at least once a year. |
| |
|
|
|
5.3.5 |
Job Rotation Frequency and Sequence |
This Policy makes no stipulation regarding frequency or sequence
of job rotation. Local policies, which do impose requirements, will
provide for continuity and integrity of the PKI service. |
| |
|
|
|
5.3.6 |
Sanctions for Unauthorized Actions |
In the event of actual or suspected unauthorized action by a
person performing duties with respect to the operation of the
Issuing CA or RA, the Issuing CA should suspend his or her access to
the Issuing CA system. |
| |
|
|
|
5.3.7 |
Contracting Personnel Requirements |
The Issuing CA must ensure that contractor access to the Issuing
CA site is in accordance with Section 5.1.1. |
| |
|
|
|
5.3.8 |
Documentation Supplied to Personnel |
Documentation sufficient to define duties and procedures for each
role will be provided to the personnel filling that role. |
| |
|
|
|
5.4 |
SECURITY AUDIT PROCEDURES |
|
| |
|
|
|
5.4.1 |
Types of Event Recorded |
The Issuing CA equipment will be able to record events related to
the server (installation, modification, accesses), and the
application (requests, responses, actions, publications, and error
conditions). Events may be attributable to human action (in any
role) or automatically invoked by the equipment. At a minimum, the
information recorded will include the type of event, and the time
the event occurred. In addition, for some types it will be
appropriate to record the success or failure, the source and
destination of a message, or the disposition of a created object
(e.g., a filename). Where possible, the audit data will be
automatically collected; when this is not possible a logbook, paper
form, or other physical mechanism will be used. The auditing
capabilities of the underlying equipment operating system will be
enabled during installation. A record will be kept of file
manipulation and account management. These events will also be
recorded during normal operation of the Issuing CA equipment. |
| |
|
|
|
5.4.2 |
Frequency of Processing Log |
The Issuing CA must ensure that its audit logs are reviewed by CA
personnel at least weekly and all significant events are explained
in an audit log summary. Such reviews involve verifying that the log
has not been tampered with, and then briefly inspecting all log
entries, with a more thorough investigation of any alerts or
irregularities in the logs. Supporting manual and electronic logs
from the Issuing CA and RA should be compared where any action is
deemed suspicious. Actions taken following these reviews must be
documented. |
| |
|
|
|
5.4.3 |
Retention Period for Audit Log |
The information generated on the Issuing CA equipment will be
kept on the Issuing CA equipment until the information is moved to
an appropriate archive facility. Deletion of the audit log from the
Issuing CA equipment will be performed by a person other than the CA
Operator. This person will be identified in the Issuing CA's CPS.
Audit logs will be retained as archive records in accordance with
Section 5.5.2. |
| |
|
|
|
5.4.4 |
Protection of Audit Log |
The audit log, to the extent possible, will not be open for
reading or modification by any human, or by any automated process
other than those that perform audit processing. Any entity that does
not have modification access to the audit log may archive it (note
that deletion requires modification access). Weekly audit data will
be moved to a safe, secure storage location separate from the
Issuing CA equipment. |
| |
|
|
|
5.4.5 |
Audit Log Backup Procedures |
Audit logs and audit summaries must be backed up or copied if in
manual form. |
| |
|
|
|
5.4.6 |
Audit Collection System (Internal vs. External) |
There is no requirement for the audit log collection system to be
external to the Issuing CA equipment. The audit process will run
independently and will not in any way be under the control of the CA
Operator. Audit processes will be invoked at system startup, and
cease only at system shutdown. Should it become apparent that an
automated audit system has failed, the Issuing CA operation will
cease until the audit capability can be restored. If it is
unacceptable to cease CA operation, other means will be employed to
provide audit capability that has been previously arranged with the
Issuing CA's auditor. |
| |
|
|
|
5.4.7 |
Notification to Event-Causing Subject |
Where an event is logged by the audit collection system no notice
need be given to the Individual, Organization, device or application
which caused the event. |
| |
|
|
|
5.4.8 |
Vulnerability Assessments |
Events in the audit process are logged, in part, to monitor
system vulnerabilities. The Issuing CA must ensure that a
vulnerability assessment is performed, reviewed and revised
following an examination of these monitored events. |
| |
|
|
|
5.5 |
RECORDS ARCHIVAL |
|
| |
|
|
|
5.5.1 |
Types of Event Recorded |
Issuing CA archive records will be detailed enough to establish
the validity of a signature and of the proper operation of the PKI.
At a minimum, the following data will be recorded and archived: |
| |
|
|
|
5.5.1.1 |
Certificate Issuance |
- Applicant’s name as it appears in the Certificate’s
"Common Name" field
- Method of application (i.e., online, in-person, etc.)
- For each data element accepted for proofing, including
electronic forms:
- Name of document presented for identity proofing
- Issuing authority
- Date of issuance
- Date of expiration
- All fields verified
- Source of verification (i.e., which databases used)
- Method of verification (i.e., online, in-person)
- Date/time of verification
- Name of the RA
- All associated error messages and codes
- Date/time of process completion
- Date/time of Certificate download/Acceptance
|
|
5.5.1.2 |
Certificate Validation |
- Certificate serial number
- Certificate status with reason code
- All associated error messages and codes
- Date/time of all Certificate validation requests
- Date/time of transmission of Certificate status request
responses
|
|
5.5.1.3 |
Certificate
Revocation |
- Date/time
- Name of the RA
- End Entity’s common name
- Reason code for revocation request
- Certificate serial number
- All associated verification request and revocation data
|
| |
|
|
|
5.5.1.4 |
Certificate Renewal |
- Certificate serial number
- Certificate common name
- New Validity Period dates
- Date/time of completion of renewal process
- All associated renewal data
|
| |
|
|
|
5.5.2 |
Retention Period for Archive |
Archive records will be kept for a period of at least seven
years, six months without any loss of data. If the original media
cannot retain the data for the required period, a mechanism to
periodically transfer the archived data to new media will be defined
by the archive site. Software applications required to process the
archive data will also be maintained for as long as necessary. After
the archive retention period, PKI Service Providers are responsible
for maintaining the authenticity and integrity of their own valuable
documents. |
| |
|
|
|
5.5.3 |
Protection of Archive |
No unauthorized individual will be able to write to, modify, or
delete the archive. However, archived records may be moved to
another medium. The contents of the archive will not be released as
a whole, except as required by law. Records of individual
transactions may be released upon request of any entities involved
in the transaction or their legally recognized agents. Archive media
will be stored in a separate, safe, secure storage facility. |
| |
|
|
|
5.5.4 |
Archive Backup Procedures |
Adequate backup procedures must be in place so that in the event
of the loss or destruction of the primary archives, a complete set
of backup copies will be readily available within a short period of
time. |
| |
|
|
|
5.5.5 |
Requirements for Time-Stamping of Records |
Certificate validations and witnessed document signing
(notarization) will be time-stamped. |
| |
|
|
|
5.5.6 |
Archive Collection System (Internal or External) |
No stipulation. |
| |
|
|
|
5.5.7 |
Procedures to Obtain and Verify Archive Information |
Procedures to obtain and verify archive information and
procedures detailing how to create, package and send the archive
information will be published in the Issuing CA procedures handbook
or CPS. Only authorized users will be allowed to access the archive.
During any inspections required by this Policy, the inspector will
verify the integrity of the archives. |
| |
|
|
|
5.5.8 |
Long Term Information
Preservation |
No stipulation. |
| |
|
|
|
5.6 |
KEY
CHANGEOVER |
An End Entity may only apply to renew his, her or its TrustID
Certificate within three months prior to the expiration of one of
the Keys, provided the previous Certificate has not been revoked. An
End Entity, the Issuing CA, or the RA may initiate this Key
changeover process. Automated key changeover is permitted. The
Issuing CA must ensure that the details of this process are
indicated in its CPS or other publicly available document. End
Entities without valid Keys must be re-authenticated by the Issuing
CA or RA in the same manner as the initial registration. Where an
End Entity’s TrustID Certificate has been revoked as a result of
non-compliance, the Issuing CA must verify that any reasons for
non-compliance have been addressed to its satisfaction prior to
Certificate re-issuance. Keys may not be renewed using an expired
Key. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
COMPROMISE AND DISASTER RECOVERY |
|
| |
|
|
|
5.7.1 |
Computing Resources Software and/or Data Are Corrupted |
The Issuing CA must have in place an appropriate disaster
recovery and business resumption plan. The plan must set up and
render operational a facility located in a geographically diverse
area that is capable of providing CA Services in accordance with
this Policy within forty eight (48) hours of an unanticipated
emergency. Such plan will include a complete and periodic test of
readiness for such facility. Such plan will be referenced within the
CPS or other appropriate documentation and available to Authorized
Relying Parties for inspection. |
| |
|
|
|
5.7.2 |
Secure Facility After a Natural or Other Type of Disaster |
The Issuing CA must establish a disaster recovery plan outlining
the steps to be taken to re-establish a secure facility in the event
of a natural or other type of disaster. Where a repository is not
under the control of the Issuing CA, the Issuing CA must ensure that
any Agreement with the Repository provides that a disaster recovery
plan be established and documented by the Repository. |
| |
|
|
|
5.7.3 |
Entity Public Key is Revoked |
In the event of the need for revocation of an Issuing CA's CA
Certificate, the Issuing CA must immediately notify: (i) the PMA;
(ii) all CAs to whom it has issued cross-certificates; (iii) all of
its RAs; (iv) all Certificate Holders; and (v) all Individuals or
Organizations who are responsible for a Certificate used to an
Electronic Device. The Issuing CA must also: (i) publish the CA
Certificate serial number on an appropriate CRL; and (ii) revoke all
cross-Certificates signed with the revoked CA Certificate. After
addressing the factors that led to revocation, the Issuing CA may:
(i) generate a new CA signing Key Pair; and (ii) re-issue
TrustID Certificates to all End Entities and ensure all CRLs and
ARLs are signed using the new Key. In the event of the need for
revocation of any other entity's Digital Signature Certificate, see
Section 4.9. |
| |
|
|
|
5.7.4 |
Entity Private Key is Compromised |
In the event of the compromise, or suspected compromise, of the
Issuing CA’s CA Private Signing Key, the Issuing CA must
immediately notify all CAs with whom it has cross-certified. In the
event of the compromise, or suspected compromise, of any other
Participant's signing Key, the Participant must notify the Issuing
CA immediately. The Issuing CA must ensure that its CPS or a
publicly available document and appropriate agreements contain
provisions outlining the means it will use to provide notice of
compromise or suspected compromise.
In the event of the compromise of an Issuing CA's CA Private
Signing Key, the Issuing CA must revoke all Certificates issued
using that Key and provide appropriate notice (see Section
5.7.3). After addressing the factors that led to Key compromise, the
Issuing CA may: (i) generate a new CA Signing Key Pair;
(ii) re-issue Certificates to all End Entities and ensure all
CRLs and ARLs are signed using the new Key. |
| |
|
|
|
5.7.5 |
Entity Public Key is Downgraded |
In the event of the need for the downgrade of an Issuing CA's CA
Certificate, the Issuing CA must immediately notify all interested
parties including the PMA, other CAs with whom it cross-certified,
all RAs and all Certificate Holders. |
| |
|
|
|
5.8 |
CA TERMINATION |
In the event that the Issuing CA ceases operation, all
Certificate Holders, Sponsoring Organizations, RAs, CMAs,
Repositories, and Authorized Relying Parties will be promptly
notified of the termination. In addition, all CAs with which
cross-certification agreements are current at the time of cessation
will be promptly informed of the termination. All TrustID
Certificates issued by the Issuing CA that reference this Policy
will be revoked no later than the time of termination. All current
and archived CA identity proofing, Certificate, validation,
revocation, renewal, policy and practices, billing, and audit data
will be transferred to the PMA (or designate) within 24 hours of
Issuing CA cessation and in accordance with this Policy. Transferred
data will not include any data unrelated to this Policy. No key
recovery enabled repository data will be co-mingled with this data. |
| |
|
|
|
5.9 |
CUSTOMER SERVICE |
As described in this Policy, the Issuing CA will implement and
maintain a Customer Service Center to provide assistance and
services to Certificate Holders and Authorized Relying Parties, and
a system for receiving, recording, responding to and reporting
problems within its own Organization and for reporting such problems
to the PMA. |
| |
|
|
|
6 |
TECHNICAL SECURITY CONTROLS |
|
| |
|
|
|
6.1 |
KEY PAIR GENERATION AND INSTALLATION |
|
| |
|
|
|
6.1.1 |
Key Pair Generation |
Key Pairs for all PKI Service Providers and End Entities must be
generated in such a way that the Private Key is not known by other
than the Key holder. Acceptable ways to accomplish this include: (i)
requiring all Participants generate their own Keys using a
trustworthy system; (ii) directing Participants not to reveal the
Private Keys to anyone else; and/or (iii) having keys generated in
hardware Tokens from which the Private Key cannot be extracted.
Despite the foregoing, all PKI Service Provider Keys (other than
Repositories) must be generated in Tokens. Key pairs for
Repositories, and End Entities can be generated in either hardware
or software Cryptomodules. |
| |
|
|
|
6.1.2 |
Private Key Delivery |
In most cases, a Private Key will be generated and remain within
the crypto boundary of the Cryptomodule. If the owner of the
Cryptomodule generates the Key, then there is no need to deliver the
Private Key. If a Key is not generated by the intended Key holder,
then the person generating the Key in the Cryptomodule (e.g., Smart
Card) must securely deliver the Cryptomodule to the intended Key
holder. Accountability for the location and state of the
Cryptomodule must be maintained until delivery and possession
occurs. The recipient will acknowledge receipt of the Cryptomodule
to the Issuing CA or the RA. If the End Entity generates the Key,
and the Key will be stored by and used by the application which
generated it, or on a hardware Token in the possession of the End
Entity, no further action is required. If the Key must be extracted
for use by other applications or in other locations, a protected
data structure (such as defined in [PKCS#12]) will be used. The
resulting file may be kept on a magnetic medium or transported
electronically. See Section 6.4.1. |
| |
|
|
|
6.1.3 |
Public Key Delivery to Certificate Issuer |
Public Keys must be delivered to the Issuing CA in a secure and
trustworthy manner, such as a Certificate request message. Delivery
may also be accomplished via non-electronic means. These means may
include, but are not limited to, floppy disk (or other storage
medium) sent via registered mail or courier, or by delivery of a
Token to the Issuing CA for local Key Generation at the point of
Certificate issuance or request. Off-line means will include
identity checking and will not inhibit proof of possession of
corresponding Private Key. Any other methods used for Public Key
delivery will be stipulated in a CPS or Certificate Agreement. In
those cases where Key Pairs are generated by the Issuing CA on
behalf of the End Entity, the Issuing CA will implement secure
mechanisms to ensure that the Token on which the Key Pair is held is
securely sent to the proper End Entity, and that the Token is not
activated prior to receipt by the proper End Entity. |
| |
|
|
|
6.1.4 |
CA Public Key Delivery to Certificate Holders |
The Public Key corresponding to the Issuing CA's CA Private
Signing Key may be delivered to End Entities in an online
transaction in accordance with IETF PKIX Part 3, or other
appropriate mechanism. |
| |
|
|
|
6.1.5 |
Key Sizes |
Minimum Key length for other than elliptic curve based algorithms
is 1024 bits. Minimum Key length for elliptic curve group algorithms
is 170 bits. |
| |
|
|
|
6.1.6 |
Public Key Parameters Generation |
The Issuing CA that utilizes the DSA must generate parameters in
accordance with FIPS 186. ECDSA must be utilized in accordance with
Draft ANSI Standard X9.62. |
| |
|
|
|
6.1.7 |
Parameter Quality Checking |
Parameters for DSA will be checked as specified in [FIPS186]. |
| |
|
|
|
6.1.8 |
Hardware/Software Key Generation |
All Keys for Issuing CAs and RAs must be randomly generated in a
Token. Any pseudo-random numbers used for Key generation material
will be generated by an FIPS approved method. |
| |
|
|
|
6.1.9 |
Key Usage Purposes (As Per X.509 V3 Key Usage Field) |
Keys may be used for authentication, non-repudiation and message
integrity. They may also be used for session key establishment. CA
Private Signing Keys are the only Keys permitted to be used for
signing Certificates and CRLs. The Certificate Key Usage field must
be used in accordance with PKIX-1 Certificate and CRL Profile. One
of the following Key Usage values must be present in all
Certificates: (i) Digital Signature; or (ii) Non-Repudiation.
One of the following additional values must be present in CA
Certificate-signing Certificates: (i) Key Cert Sign; or (ii) CRL
Sign. The use of a specific Key is determined by the Key usage
extension in the X.509 Certificate. This restriction is not intended
to prohibit use of protocols (like the Secure Sockets Layer) that
provide authenticated connections using Key management Certificates. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2 |
CA PRIVATE KEY PROTECTION |
Each PKI Service Provider must protect its Private Key(s) in
accordance with the provisions of this Policy. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.1 |
Standards For Cryptomodule |
The relevant standard for Cryptomodules is [FIPS140-1], however
the PMA may determine that other comparable validation,
certification, or verification standards are sufficient. These
standards will be published by the PMA. Cryptomodules will be
validated to the FIPS level identified in this Section, or
validated, certified, or verified via one of the standards published
by the PMA. End Entities will use Cryptomodules that meet at least
the criteria specified for Level 1. RAs require at least Level 2
hardware Cryptomodules. A higher level may be used if available or
desired. RAs and Issuing CAs should provide the option of using any
acceptable Cryptomodule, to facilitate the management of
Certificates. The Issuing CA may use hardware or software
Cryptomodules for CA key generation and protection, validated at
Level 2. Certificates will be signed using a hardware Cryptomodule
that meets Level 2. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.2 |
Private Key Multi-Person Control |
Multi-person control is a security mechanism that requires
multiple authorizations for access to the CA Private Signing Key.
For example, access to the CA Private Signing Key should require
authorization and validation by multiple parties, including CA
personnel and separate security officers. This mechanism prevents a
single party (CA or otherwise) from gaining access to the CA Private
Signing Key.
CA Private Signing Keys may be backed up only under two-person
control. The parties used for two-person control will be maintained
on a list that will be made available for inspection by PKI Service
Providers. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.3 |
Private Key Escrow |
Private Keys used for encryption and decryption only, and not for
Digital Signatures, may be escrowed for Key recovery purposes. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.4 |
Private Key Backup |
A Participant may optionally back-up his, her or its own Private
Key. If so, the Key must be copied and stored in encrypted form and
protected at a level no lower than stipulated for the primary
version of the Key. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
Private Key Archival |
If the Issuing CA is acting as a Key Recovery agent, then it will
archive Private Key Management Keys as part of its service. Private
Keys supporting non-repudiation services will never be archived. A
Participant may optionally archive its own Private Key. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.6 |
Private Key Entry Into Cryptomodule |
PKI Service Provider Private Keys are to be generated by and in a
Cryptomodule. In the event that a Private Key is to be transported
from one Cryptomodule to another, the Private Key must be encrypted
during transport. Private Keys must never exist in plain text form
outside the Cryptomodule boundary. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.7 |
Method of Activating Private Key |
An End Entity must be authenticated to the Cryptomodule before
the activation of the Private Key. This authentication may be in the
form of a password. When deactivated, Private Keys must be kept in
encrypted form only. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.8 |
Method of Deactivating Private Key |
Cryptomodules that have been activated must not be left
unattended or otherwise open to unauthorized access. After use, they
must be deactivated, using, for example, a manual logout procedure
or a passive timeout. When not in use, hardware Cryptomodules should
be removed and stored, unless they are within the End Entity’s
sole control. |
| |
|
|
|
6.2.9 |
Method of Destroying Private Key |
Private Keys should be destroyed when they are no longer needed,
or when the Certificates to which they correspond expire or are
revoked. For software Cryptomodules, this can be done by overwriting
the data. For Tokens, this will likely be accomplished by executing
a "zeroize" command. Physical destruction of hardware is
not required. |
| |
|
|
|
6.3 |
OTHER ASPECTS OF KEY PAIR MANAGEMENT |
|
| |
|
|
|
6.3.1 |
Public Key Archival |
The Issuing CA must retain all verification Public Keys. |
| |
|
|
|
6.3.2 |
Validity Periods |
All Certificates and corresponding Keys shall have maximum
Validity Periods not to exceed the following: (i) CA public
verification Key and Certificate - twenty years; (ii) CA
Private Signing Key and Certificate - eight years; (iii) End-Entity
public verification Key and Certificate - twelve years; (iv)
End-Entity signing Key - three years. Certificates and Keys must not
be used after the expiration of the Validity Periods indicated in
this Section. |
| |
|
|
|
6.3.3 |
Restrictions on CA's Private Key Use |
The Private Key used by the Issuing CA for issuing Certificates
will be used only for signing such Certificates and, optionally,
CRLs or other validation services responses. A Private Key held by
an RA, if any, is: (i) considered the Issuing CA's Private Key; (ii)
is held by the RA as a fiduciary; and (iii) will not be used by the
RA for any other purposes, except those specifically agreed to
between the Issuing CA and the RA. Further, any other Private Key
used by an RA for purposes associated with its RA functions will not
be used for any other purpose without the express permission of the
Issuing CA. The Private Key used by each RA in connection with the
issuance of Certificates will be used only for communications
relating to the approval or revocation of such Certificates. |
| |
|
|
|
6.3.4 |
Usage Periods for the Public and Private Keys |
The Key usage periods for keying material is described in Section
3.2. |
| |
|
|
|
6.4 |
ACTIVATION DATA |
|
| |
|
|
|
6.4.1 |
Activation Data Generation and Installation |
A pass-phrase, PIN or other Activation Data shall be used to
protect access to the Private Key. The Activation Data may be
user-selected. If the Activation Data must be transmitted to the End
Entity, it shall be via a channel of appropriate protection, and
distinct in time and place from the associated Cryptomodule. If this
is not done by hand, the End Entity should be advised of the date
sent, method of sending, and expected delivery date of any
Activation Data. As part of the delivery method, End Entities should
acknowledge receipt of the Cryptomodule and Activation Data. In
addition, End Entities should also receive (and acknowledge receipt
of) information regarding the use and control of the Cryptomodule. See
Section 6.1.2. |
| |
|
|
|
6.4.2 |
Activation Data Protection |
Activation Data should be memorized, not written down. If written
down, it must be secured at the level of the data that the
associated Cryptomodule is used to protect, and will not be stored
with the Cryptomodule. Activation Data must never be shared. |
| |
|
|
|
6.4.3 |
Other Aspects of Activation Data |
This Policy makes no stipulation on the life of Activation Data;
however, it should be changed periodically to decrease the
likelihood that it has been discovered. CAs may define Activation
Data requirements in their CPSs or Certificate Agreements. |
| |
|
|
|
6.5 |
COMPUTER SECURITY CONTROLS |
|
| |
|
|
|
6.5.1 |
Specific Computer Security Technical Requirements |
All Issuing CA servers must include the following functionality
either provided by the operating system or through a combination of
operating system, PKI application, and physical safeguards: (i)
access control to CA services and PKI roles; (ii) enforced
separation of duties for PKI roles; (iii) identification and
authentication of PKI roles and associated identities; (iv) object
re-use or separation for CA random access memory; (v) use of
cryptography for session communication and database security; (vi)
archival of CA and End-Entity history and audit data; (vii) audit of
security related events; (viii) self-test of security related CA
services; (ix) trusted path for identification of PKI roles and
associated identities; (x) recovery mechanisms for Keys and the
Issuing CA system; and (xi) enforcement of domain integrity
boundaries for security critical processes. |
| |
|
|
|
6.5.2 |
Computer Security Rating |
The Issuing CA's equipment will meet and be operated to at least
a C2 [TCSEC] or E2/F-C2 [ITSEC] rating or equivalent. The Issuing
CA's equipment operating at a C2 equivalence will, as a minimum,
implement: (i) self-protection; (ii) process isolation; (iii)
discretionary access control; (iv) object reuse controls; (v)
individual I&A; and (vi) a protected audit record. |
| |
|
|
|
6.6 |
LIFE CYCLE TECHNICAL CONTROLS |
Issuing CA equipment (hardware and software) procured to operate
a PKI will be purchased in a fashion to reduce the likelihood that
any particular copy was tampered with; for instance, by random
selection. Issuing CA equipment developed for a PKI will be
developed in a controlled environment and the development process
will be defined and documented. Equipment procured prior to
registration as the Issuing CA will be deemed to satisfy this
requirement.
Issuing CA equipment will be protectively packaged and delivered
via an accountable method. Tamper-evident packaging will be used or
equipment will be hand-carried from a controlled procurement
environment to the installation site. Equipment procured prior to
registration as the Issuing CA will be deemed to satisfy this
requirement. The Issuing CA equipment will be dedicated to
administering a key management infrastructure. It will not have
installed applications or component software, which are not part of
the CA configuration. Equipment updates will be purchased or
developed in the same manner as original equipment, and be installed
by trusted and trained personnel in a defined manner. |
| |
|
|
|
6.6.1 |
System
Development Controls |
The Issuing CA must use CA software that has been designed and
developed either under a development methodology such as
MIL-STD-498, the System Security Engineering Capability Maturity
Model (SSE CMM), or Information Systems Security Engineering
Handbook. The design and development process must provide sufficient
documentation to support third party security evaluation of the
Issuing CA components and be supported by third party verification
of process compliance and on-going assessments to influence security
safeguard design and minimize residual risk. |
| |
|
|
|
6.6.2 |
Security Management Controls |
A formal configuration management methodology must be used for
installation and ongoing maintenance of the Issuing CA system. The
Issuing CA software, when first loaded, must provide a method for
the Issuing CA to verify that the software on the system: (i)
originated from the software developer; (ii) has not been modified
prior to installation; and (iii) is the version intended for use.
The Issuing CA must provide a mechanism to periodically verify the
integrity of the software. The Issuing CA must also have mechanisms
and policies in place to control and monitor the configuration of
the Issuing CA system. Upon installation time, and at least once
every 24 hours, the integrity of the Issuing CA system must be
validated. |
| |
|
|
|
6.7 |
NETWORK SECURITY CONTROLS |
Issuing CA equipment should be connected to no more than two
network domains at a time. Issuing CA equipment intended to connect
to more than one network classification domain will have procedures
defined in a CPS, or other document made available to its auditors,
that prevent information from one domain from reaching another
(e.g., equipment shutdown, removable hard drives, switching the
network connection). Issuing CA equipment may operate through a
network guard insofar as it does not circumvent the function of the
guard. Protection of Issuing CA equipment will be provided against
known network attacks. Use of appropriate boundary controls will be
employed. All unused network ports and services will be turned off.
Any network software present on the Issuing CA equipment will be
necessary to the functioning of the Issuing CA application. Root
Issuing CA equipment will be stand-alone (off-line) configurations. |
| |
|
|
|
6.8 |
CRYPTOMODULE ENGINEERING CONTROLS |
Requirements for Cryptomodules are as stated above in Section
6.2. |
| |
|
|
|
7 |
CERTIFICATE AND CRL PROFILES |
|
| |
|
|
|
7.1 |
CERTIFICATE PROFILE |
TrustID Certificates will contain Public Keys used for
authenticating the sender of a electronic messages and verifying the
integrity of such messages -- i.e., Public Keys used for Digital
Signature verification. All TrustID Certificates will be issued in
the X.509 version 3 format and will include a reference to the OID
for this Policy within the appropriate field. The CPS or other
publicly available document will identify the Certificate extensions
supported, and the level of support for those extensions. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.1 |
Version Number And Base Fields |
The Issuing CA must issue X.509 Version 3 Certificates, in
accordance with the PKIX Certificate and CRL Profile. The PKI
End-Entity software must support all the base (non-extension) X.509
fields: |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.1.1 |
Version |
version of X.509 Certificate, version 3(2) |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.1.2 |
Serial Number |
unique serial number for Certificate as well as the Certificate
extensions defined 7.1.2 |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.1.3 |
Signature |
Issuing CA signature to authenticate Certificate |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.1.4 |
Issuer |
name of Issuing CA |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.1.5 |
Validity Period |
activation and expiry date for Certificate |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.1.6 |
Subject |
End Entity’s DN |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.1.7 |
Subject Public
Key Information |
End Entity’s Public Key |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.2 |
Certificate Extensions |
No extension will modify or undermine the use of X.509 base
fields. Additionally: |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.2.1 |
Certificate Policies |
No stipulation. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.2.2 |
Policy Constraints |
No stipulation. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.2.3 |
Critical Extensions |
All Participant PKI software must correctly process the
extensions identified in 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 of the PKIX Certificate
profile. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.2.4 |
Supported Extensions |
The CPS or other publicly available document must define the use
of any extensions supported by the Issuing CA, its RAs and End
Entities. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.3 |
Algorithm Object Identifiers |
TrustID Certificates under this Policy will use the following
OIDs for signatures: id-dsa-with-sha1 {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840)
x9-57(10040) x9cm(4) 3}. Certificates under this Policy will use the
following OIDs for identifying the algorithm the subject key was
generated for: Encryption {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) (113549)
pkcs(1) pkcs-1(1) 1} publicnumber {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840)
ansi-x942(10046) number-type(2) 1}. Certificates containing keys
generated for use with DSA or for use with KEA will be signed with
id-dsa-with-sha1. Keys generated for use with RSA will be signed
using sha-1WithRSAEncryption. For alternate algorithms, only
PMA-approved algorithms may be used. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.4 |
Name Forms |
Every DN must be in the form of an X.501 printable string. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.5 |
Name Constraints |
Subject and Issuer DNs must comply with PKIX standards and be
present in all Certificates. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.6 |
Certificate Policy Object Identifier |
The Issuing CA must ensure that the Policy OID is contained
within the Certificates it issues. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.7 |
Usage of Policy Constraints Extension |
The Issuing CA must populate and mark as critical the
policyConstraints extension. |
| |
|
|
|
7.1.8 |
Policy Qualifiers Syntax and Semantics |
The Issuing CA must populate the policyQualifiers extension with
the URI of its CP. If the Issuing CA populates the userNotice
extension, it will contain text substantially similar to the
following:
This TrustID Certificate may only be relied upon by
Authorized Relying Parties in accordance with the TrustID
Certificate Policy found at
http//:www.trustdst.com/certificates/policy/tsindex.html.
|
| |
|
|
|
7.2 |
CRL PROFILE |
If utilized, CRLs will be issued in the X.509 version 2 format.
The CPS or other publicly available document will identify will
identify the CRL extensions supported and the level of support for
these extensions. |
| |
|
|
|
7.2.1 |
Version Numbers |
The Issuing CA must issue X.509 version two (2) CRLs in
accordance with the PKIX Certificate and CRL Profile. |
| |
|
|
|
7.2.2 |
CRL And CRL Entry Extensions |
All End Entity PKI software must correctly process all CRL
extensions identified in the Certificate and CRL profile. The CPS or
other publicly available document will identify must define the use
of any extensions supported by the Issuing CA, its RAs and End
Entities. |
| |
|
|
|
8 |
POLICY ADMINISTRATION |
|
| |
|
|
|
8.1 |
POLICY CHANGE PROCEDURES |
This Policy will be reviewed on a yearly basis. Errors, updates,
or suggested changes to this document should be communicated to the
contact in Section 1.4. Such communication must include a
description of the change, a change justification, and contact
information for the person requesting the change. All policy changes
under consideration by the PMA will be disseminated to interested
parties (see Section 8.2) for a period of at least one month.
The PMA will accept, with modifications, or reject the proposed
change after completion of the review period. |
| |
|
|
|
8.1.1 |
List of Items That Can Change Without Notification |
Editorial and typographical corrections, changes to contact
details and other minor changes that do not materially impact
Participants may be changed without notice and are not subject to
the notification requirements herein. |
| |
|
|
|
8.1.2 |
List of Items Subject to Notification Requirement |
All changes to this Policy that may materially affect
Participants are subject to the notification requirement. Prior to
making any such changes to this Policy, the PMA will notify all CAs
that are directly cross-certified with the PMA. |
| |
|
|
|
8.1.3 |
Comment Period, Process And Procedure |
Affected Participants may file comments with the PMA within 30
days of original notice. If the proposed change is modified as a
result of such comments, a new notice of the modified proposed
change will be given. |
| |
|
|
|
8.2 |
PUBLICATION AND NOTIFICATION POLICIES |
|
| |
|
|
|
8.2.1 |
Copy of Policy |
A copy of this Policy is available in electronic form on the
Internet at
http://www.trustdst.com/certificates/policy/tsindex.html, and via
e-mail from info@trustdst.com. Approved Issuing CAs will post
copies of, or links to, this Policy in their Repositories. |
| |
|
|
|
8.2.2 |
Notification of Changes |
The PMA will notify all Issuing CAs authorized to issue
Certificates under this Policy of proposed changes, the final date
for receipt of comments, and the proposed effective date of change.
The PMA may request that the Issuing CA notify RAs and Certificate
Holders of the proposed changes. The PMA will also post a notice of
the proposal on the PMA World Wide Web site. |
| |
|
|
|
8.2.2.1 |
Mechanism to Handle Comments |
Written and signed comments on proposed changes must be directed
to the PMA. Decisions with respect to the proposed changes are at
the sole discretion of the PMA. |
| |
|
|
|
8.2.2.2 |
Final Change Notice |
The PMA will determine the period for final change notice. |
| |
|
|
|
8.2.3 |
Items Whose Change Requires a New Policy |
If a policy change is determined by the PMA to warrant the
issuance of a new policy, the PMA may assign a new OID for the
modified policy.
|
| |
|
|
|
8.3 |
CPS APPROVAL PROCEDURES |
The approval of an Issuing CA’s CPS must be in accordance with
procedures specified by the PMA. Where the Issuing CA's CPS contains
information relevant to the security of the Issuing CA, all or part
of the CPS need not be made publicly available. |
| |
|
|
|
8.4 |
WAIVERS |
Waivers will not be granted under any level of assurance.
Variation in the Issuing CA's practice will either be deemed
acceptable under this Policy, or a change will be requested to this
Policy, or a new policy will be established for the non-compliant
practice. |